User talk:DASonnenfeld/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:DASonnenfeld. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Category:Women in forestry
Category:Women in forestry, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Sonnenfeld, thank you so much for your advise and help with the article.
Best Regards--Arnofk (talk) 09:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Sonnenfeld, hwow I'll be able to do the requested change? Which parts you're reffering to? Thank you in advance for your advice! --Arnofk (talk) 08:08, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Arnofk, Please see WP:NPOV for guidelines and suggestions. The tag refers to the current draft of the article as a whole, not any particular part. The key may be to find reliable, third-party sources that can provide a balanced view of both strengths and limitations of the organization. Thanks for your contributions. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Sonnenfeld, thank you again for the advice. I'll try everything to include the mentioned sources. Kind regards!--Arnofk (talk) 10:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Palm oil
You've done a good job with your recent edits to Palm oil. I was just wondering whether the sub-headings in several sections were not too large. Compare them to the sub-headings that are names of countries lower down in the article. Just a thought. – CorinneSD (talk) 16:01, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, CorinneSD. Thanks for your comment and suggestion. I've tweaked the headings a little further. Hope this helps! Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 17:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Category:Environment disambiguation pages
Category:Environment disambiguation pages, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I thought that you may be interested in this and related AfDs. --Randykitty (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
OER inquiry
Hi DASonnenfeld, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Sara, Thanks for your note... I did? Which article was that? Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 20:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi DA Sonnenfeld, you did! Or perhaps someone posed as you to edit the Open Access article back in the day... I'm sorry if this seems like a strange or intrusive inquiry. We're very close to the research so there's probably a bit of a field/trees disconnect. Feel free to take the survey if you please! Thanks for the nice note. - Sara FB (talk) 15:30, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Sara, Oh okay, thanks! Yes, that was me... A simple edit (I added the property navbox). I thought perhaps your query related to the Open SUNY article stub, also generally related to your topic. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Cool! Check out WikiProject Open if that's something you'd like to attract interest to - and maybe find others to work on the stub. Or join us in furthering work on open education articles! :) - Sara FB (talk) 19:20, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Art parks
Category:Art parks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: George Sumner Bridges (May 18)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Sumner Bridges.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Sumner Bridges has a new comment
Juhasz article
I generally like to keep all article discussions on their talk page, but I've run into something that seems a little personal so will mention it here. Looking back over your recent edits I see that you just recently added the BP spill to the newly created See also section. I have long worked on that (BP) article and thought that its addition was more of a reaction to the discussion on her talk page. However, I can see that you are doing a lot of productive work with her bio and I could certainly be wrong about removing it. If you have thoughts about including it please bring it up on the talk page and I am open to discussion. Best, Gandy Gandydancer (talk) 16:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Gandy, Thanks for your note. No problem... My addition of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill to the 'See also' section of the Juhasz article was based on the relation between her work on oil and that incident. It is linked already earlier in the article, so perhaps not needed in the 'See also' section anyway. Thanks for your work on the article. It is getting there, with a ways to go yet. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- I had hoped to add a section re her reports on the spill to her article--if there was information at one time it may have been lost in the recent reorganization. I do feel that its important to her article to mention it. Since you are working with the article, would you care to add something? Ref # 10 refers to it... Gandydancer (talk) 13:54, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Have added a couple of things. Hope this helps! Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cornelius B. Murphy, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Michael's College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
WP:REDNOT in Thai coup article
Continued misuse of WP:REDNOT will be viewed by me as a reason to go to WP:ANI. Abductive (reasoning) 02:21, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Abductive, Here's the relevant section of WP:REDNOT, emphasis added:
Red links to personal names should be avoided... red-linking has led to people being incorrectly identified on Wikipedia... The risk of misidentification is especially concerning when dealing with living people.
- I'm sorry that you find my reference to this as problematic; it has been used in good faith. Sincerely, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 23:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Draft Template for WikiProject Globalization's 2014 Wikimania leaflet
Please comment on or edit the Draft Template for WikiProject Globalization's 2014 Wikimania leaflet. See the template and details here. Thanks! Meclee (talk) 13:20, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Meclee, Looks good! Made a few minor tweaks... Thanks & Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:27, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Syracuse Orange baseball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Fixed. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:01, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
