User talk:CzarB

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)[edit]

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! -- Lost^(talk) 10:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gratitude[edit]

Czar, thank you for your reversion of the Battlefield High School article to the unvandalized article. I note that the offending IP address has quite a history of vandalism and being blocked. Thank you for your proactivity in keeping our community up to par!

Your edit to Natalie Suleyman[edit]

You restored a great deal of negative material to this article when you reverted the page blanking. The subject of this article is a living person, and all edits should conform to the WP:BLP policy. Please use care when you revert edits to these articles so that you do not inadvertently violate BLP. Frise 14:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

24.44.131.115[edit]

Good pickup! A lot of their edits were covert additions of misinformation! -- Samir 06:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work![edit]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I thought you deserved this! Great work keeping an eye out for vandalism and nonsense on such a wide variety of articles. Many thanks! Midnightdreary 23:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Userpage[edit]

Thanks a lot! — [ aldebaer⁠] 21:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Northeastern United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Mike.lifeguard | ^talk 22:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. – Mike.lifeguard | ^talk 22:45, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

False warnings[edit]

Can you please explain why you are leaving me falsified warnings, like you did for the Great Depression in the United States article? I would REALLY appreciate it. Thanks!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.68.47 (talk) 23:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

diff That isn't vandalism? CzarB 23:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

False warnings and threatened ban![edit]

Excuse me, when I marked the page for speedy deletion, it was clearly spam. It was in first person, a lot of it, like "our blah blah" and was clearly painting everything in a positive light regardless so it is clearly marketing material as it stands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.69.84 (talk) 08:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're exaggerating your claims because you have some personal agenda or bias against the institution. I only caught three instances in two sections where the collective first person pronoun "our" is used, of which I have corrected. I don't think three instances come anywhere close to "a lot it", so your claims are certainly exaggerated. If things are really as you claim, then a lot of schools and universities (especially those from Singapore it seems) would have to have their pages marked and deleted as marketing material or spam as well. Good job CzarB for correcting such wanton vandalism! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.7.149.127 (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't talk to me[edit]

Don't talk to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.66.62 (talk) 23:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]