User talk:Cuddlyopedia

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! --Henrygb 22:20, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alpha Crucis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Americanism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Xi Andromedae

Hello Cuddlyopedia. You claimed that according to http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~emamajek/WGSN/WGSN_bulletin1.pdf for Xi Andromedae resp. HR 390 the name Adhil was now officially approved. However, HR 390 and Adhil are not mentioned in the bulletin at all. Please find another source or remove your claim. Thank you, --Gereon K. (talk) 12:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IAU catalog

The URL you're using for the IAU catalog for star names (http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~emamajek/WGSN/IAU-CSN.txt) is problematic. That's a file in the personal directory of the current chair of the IAU Star Names committee - the tilde is an immediate red flag saying private copy. Certainly when the committee chair changes, that file will no longer be available at that location, and the form of the URL will attract attention suggesting it isn't WP:RS. I suspect a better URL to use would be the parent page (https://www.iau.org/science/scientific_bodies/working_groups/280/) even if it means an additional click by users to get the actual data. That URL is less certain to change, and doesn't look like a file stashed in some student's directory. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 13:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wurren (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wurren and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wurren, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 11:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Cuddlyopedia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 11:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larawag (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Larawag and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Larawag, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 11:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

8 Draconis

Just a suggestion, but you could probably create this article directly rather than through the draft process. Draft articles may take weeks or months to get approved (or rejected). This is an uncontroversial article about a star that is already in lists of probably-notable objects. I would move it myself, but I'm not formally part of the AfC team so it would be slightly unconventional. Articles created directly will still be reviewed, but this will almost certainly take place within 24 hours for any astronomical subject. If you aren't confident creating an entire visible article from scratch, you can always work in your sandbox. Just try to avoid putting the article into real categories: put a colon before the word category. You should really do this in drafts also to avoid weird stuff cluttering up the category lists. Lithopsian (talk) 12:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Look at that! You're in already :) Lithopsian (talk) 21:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 8 Draconis has been accepted

8 Draconis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]