User talk:CriticalWeightRange

Welcome![edit]

Hi CriticalWeightRange! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! JarrahTree 11:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CriticalWeightRange, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi CriticalWeightRange! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

External links[edit]

please note -WP:MOS requires external links/pdf/ to be included inside the reference framework. Bare open external links are not kosher in main space text... JarrahTree 11:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit in response to that - please also get a very good handle on WP:COI. JarrahTree 04:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As for your deleted response - at times there are no indications either way and it is hard to ascertain from a few edits - always better to know than have problems later - it was meant in WP:AGF - your editing is much appreciated - and in the end, everything is always visible as to what we do on wikipedia - regardless if we self delete or not. The big problem with a range of edits in the Australian project at the moment, is that many new editors show signs of knowledge of wiki-markup and processes with very few edits, and there are so few active editors with the capacity to review new editors or their work, it is a rather a slap dash not very methodical process of discerning the balance between showing appreciation of excellent good new editors (such as yourself), and potentially paid/coi editors who do not self identify, and a range of other issues. Always better to be thicker skinned here on wikipedia, you never know what might happen. JarrahTree 09:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well might I suggest that you failed in your attempts to find that "balance". Your tone was accusatory and disrespectful. While I appreciate your latest response and your kind compliments, I suggest that you adapt your tone in dealing with new contributors going forward, for the sake of Wikipedia and for inclusiveness. My initial reaction upon reading your comment was to throw it all in and just stop editing. I'm here to improve the quality of some pretty poor Wikipedia entries that cover matters of personal interest to me; I have no wish to be policed or harassed or subjected to petty power plays when there is *no evidence whatsoever* that I've broken any rules. I hope you are "thick skinned" enough to take this advice on board, and I hope our interactions moving forward will be more constructive, and more productive for the improvement of Australian wikipedia entries. Thank you for your conciliatory tone. CriticalWeightRange (talk) 03:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your explanation, most parts of a possible lengthy response could not be on wiki for a range of reasons - improvements and corrections to the Australian Biota project are encouraged, appreciated and hoped for, it is rather a vast work in progress from any corner requiring patience diligence and sheer persistence to get things right - thanks. JarrahTree 01:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Dead-Or-Alive-Something-In-My-House.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dead-Or-Alive-Something-In-My-House.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Dead-Or-Alive-Something-In-My-House.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dead-Or-Alive-Something-In-My-House.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 10:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 10:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Kylie Minogue. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 07:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]