User talk:Creeper122

January 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Shark (disambiguation) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shark (disambiguation) was changed by Creeper122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863952 on 2014-01-22T18:42:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Neogene. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Neogene was changed by Creeper122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963516 on 2014-01-22T18:46:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Neogene with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Neogene may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] Period. The Neogene is subdivided into two epochs, the earlier [[Miocene]] and the later [[Pliocene]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Neogene has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Neogene was changed by Creeper122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976564 on 2014-01-28T18:27:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Geologic time scale has been getting fatter[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Geologic time scale has been getting fatter, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Jakob (talk) 18:40, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Peridon (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]