User talk:CosmopolitanCapitalist

Welcome[edit]

Hello CosmopolitanCapitalist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Neo-Jay 01:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KDRGibby[edit]

I've blocked this editor as a sock of KDRGibby, who has banned from Wikipedia under his general probation. --Tony Sidaway 17:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since when do people get blocked with no evidence presented whatsover? Accustations are not enough warrant. This is not the middle ages or a witch trial. I expect a little more out of an administrator...meaning I'd like to be unblocked until their is some proof...which their is none. Speculation is not guilt. Since when did wikipedia become a totalitarian posting cabal where editors are guilty until forever. I have not even been given a chance to defend myself. (CosmopolitanCapitalist 19:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

And Bernard L you're the intellectually lazy one. You make accusations after difficult questions are asked. That is poor logic and poor debating. You can't even counter simple points or answer simple questions. The only thing you can do is accuse people of something or name call. Give me a break. Neither of you can just block people for no good reason...especially if your reason has no proof. (CosmopolitanCapitalist 19:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I've looked through the sockpuppet cases, not one mention of CosmopolitanCapitalist or KDRGibby. Tony Sidaway failed to follow procedure on top of presenting no information that supports his claim. (CosmopolitanCapitalist 20:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]