User talk:CookieRaider121

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm January. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! January (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jack Whitehall because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 10:30, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of UniLemur[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on UniLemur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Karl 334 ^Talk-^-Contribs 20:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CookieRaider121. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article UniLemur, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.--Orange Mike | Talk 21:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 21:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Skamecrazy123. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to St. Peter's Catholic School, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, CookieRaider121. You have new messages at Skamecrazy123's talk page.
Message added 17:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CookieRaider121. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:54, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, CookieRaider121. You have new messages at Skamecrazy123's talk page.
Message added 11:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Skamecrazy123 (talk) 11:11, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]