User talk:ColinEberhardt

Hi ColinEberhardt — I see you've been around for a while, but somehow no one has welcomed you yet. I hope it's ok to welcome you at this late stage!

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia, ColinEberhardt! I hope you like the place and decide to keep contributing. Since I see you've already been active here, let me just give you a few links that are always useful as a handy reference guide:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question at the village pump or feel free to ask me on my Talk page.
Oh, and just in case you don't already know: to sign your name on a Talk page like I did below, the easiest way is just to type four tildes (~~~~). To customize your signature, look here.
And remember:Be Bold!

— Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 11:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism Alert[edit]

Just so you know, even anonymous IPs have talk pages. I posted a warning at User talk:194.72.105.222, but did not block him as he had not been warned in relation to his latest actions. If he vandalises again after the warning, however, he will be blocked. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 11:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Rastelli poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rastelli poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enrico Rastelli on DYK[edit]

On 3 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Enrico Rastelli, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

-- Scott e^iπ 23:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enrico Rastelli[edit]

Ciao! Mhmhm... he has an Italian name and surname, so I guess that he was born in Russia to an Italian family working there. Anyawy, I reverted my format edits without specifying the nationality. Bye.

I've checked some sources. As I had guessed, he was Italian, simply born abroad due to his family trips for work. Bye.--Attilios 09:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your report on AIV[edit]

That is the place to report vandalism. However, generally we request that the user be warned first. Here is the list of warning templates to use. Generally, people need to get an initial warning and then a final warning before they are reported to AIV. --Woohookitty^(meow) 10:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Juggling Balls[edit]

I just wanted to say thanks for copyediting the Juggling Balls page. Your changes look really great (thanks for making a few of the sections, like "Stage Balls", less POV), though I did change "colour" to "color" (though I wouldn't be opposed to changing each occurence of the word to the British spelling, if that's what people wanted). Anyway, thanks again! Cheers, Rahzel 17:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Juggling-stub}}[edit]

There seemed to be consensus at the proposal for temporarily upmerging the template to Category:Culture stubs. User:Alai, who helped with the template, suggested populating the template, and in case there were at least 60 stubs, it would get its own Category:Juggling stubs. In case there were less than 60, it should be upmerged to a different category, such as sports stubs or to a "circus-skills-stubs" (which exists, as I understand it, but would have to be reinstated - as you can see, I'm not an expert). The other option (which I didn't like) was to make the template scope broader, e.g. with a "Circus skills" stubs template. So, it's a compromise, but not the worst, in my opinion. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 09:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great to me. I asked User:Alai if that'd be possible. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 10:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reread the proposal discussion and if I interpret it correctly, the template needs a population of 60+ to justify a category in any case, and Cat:Juggling stubs would be parented anyway by Cat:Culture stubs and maybe additionally Cat:Sports stubs (which I endorse). It's weird though, that some of the Categories parented by Culture stubs have less than 60 pages in them, see Cat:Indian dance stubs or Cat:French architect stubs. Maybe they introduced this 60-rule-of-thumb later on, to help with overcategorisation. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 10:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to ask User:Alai. As a substitute, I wonder if there is a way to include the content of a page (not just linking to it) on another page. That way we could include the content of the "what links here" for the stub page into the <noinclude>{{/use}}</noinclude> section, into the /use subpage of the template. I.e. anyone visiting the stub page would immediately see all the transcluded pages. Alternatively, we could just insert a prominent link for "what links here". —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 07:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look. It's just a first compromise, but there you have all tagged pages on one glance. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 07:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chrisbliss.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Chrisbliss.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rastelli poster.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rastelli poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airy-pattern.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Airy-pattern.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Optical-fibre.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Optical-fibre.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Michelson-interferometer.png[edit]

The file File:Michelson-interferometer.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]