User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2020/January
This is an archive of past discussions with User:ClueBot Commons. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archiving Template:Archive top and Template:Archive bottom
Category talk:American novelists was repeatedly archived to Category talk:American novelists/Archive 1 with this change:
{{archive top|...}}
→{{tl|archive top|...}}
The corresponding {{archive bottom}}
was not adjusted in any way, which results in a stripped <div>
each time.
If there is a Wikipedia policy or guideline somewhere saying what to do with {{archive top|...}}
upon archiving, please link to it here and ping me. In any event, I believe we should "tl" either both or neither the top and the bottom templates. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
@Cobi: I've been waiting a week for a response. —Anomalocaris (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
@Cobi: I would like a response. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:56, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Anomalocaris: Apologies for butting in, but just to advise that Cobi hasn't edited since 2 November last year, unfortunately. Perhaps raise this at the bot noticeboard in the absence of its operator? ——SN54129 10:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Serial Number 54129: Thank you for your suggestion. I went ahead and edited Category talk:American novelists changing each occurrence of
{{tl|archive top|...}}
→{{archive top|...}}
- as the discussions were before archiving. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
- This is documented behavior:
- @Serial Number 54129: Thank you for your suggestion. I went ahead and edited Category talk:American novelists changing each occurrence of
“ | archivenow Type: comma delimited array of strings |
” |
— User:ClueBot III#archivenow |
CBNG IRC relay is down
@Rich Smith and DamianZaremba: West.andrew.g reports that the ClueBot NG IRC relay has been down for two days, affecting tools that rely on it. Could you have a look? —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:38, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
False positive reviewing
I'm interested in assisting with reviewing false positives. How could I help with that? TK421bsod (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- The Dataset Review Interface is currently broken and has been for some time. Cobi is there any other way that editors can help?-- 5 albert square (talk) 22:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)