User talk:Cloudmichael

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matrix multiplication, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nsk92 (talk) 00:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Vector space. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Nsk92 (talk) 01:06, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Inner and outer product algebras

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Inner and outer product algebras meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inner and outer product algebras. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Nsk92 (talk) 11:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maxwell's equations

Why write the d'Alembertian as the product of two matrices? Do we learn something about Maxwell's equations by doing this? If so, what do we learn? And if so, could you please cite a reliable source that makes this point? Sorry to undo your edits, I will happy to leave them alone when you make it clear why they are relevant and what source backs that up. Thanks! :-) --Steve (talk) 05:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Matrix multiplication

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Matrix multiplication. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Nsk92 (talk) 07:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA warning

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Sławomir Biały. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edits like this one[1] are completely unacceptable. Nsk92 (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

Regarding your comment here[2] and your other edits, such as your edits (such as this one[3]) to the Matrix multiplication article:

1) The fact the section you were trying to add to Matrix multiplication is mathematically correct, is insufficient for inclusion of your research in Wikipedia articles. At a minimum , Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that the material included in Wikipedia articles be based on already published information, that has been published by reliable sources. For math articles this means mathematical research journals, books, conference proceedings etc.

2) The Wikipedia:No original research policy specifically prohibits using Wikipedia for publishing new original research, regardless of whether that research is correct.

3) Even for information based on published reliable sources and satisfying verifiability policy requirement, the inclusion of this information in a particular article is only appropriate if its inclusion does not give this information undue weight as defined by the WP:NPOV policy. In practice this means that a sufficiently large number of published reliable sources need to cover the piece of information in question; in case of a piece of research published by a particular author these sources need to be independent sources, i.e. sources published by other researchers.

4) Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline strongly discourages from using Wikipedia to promote your own research (as you were doing here[4]) and any attempt to include your own research in Wikipedia articles will need to pass a higher degree of scrutiny to overcome the undue weight presumption attached to such attempts.

5) Finally, as I noted above, per Wikipedia:No personal attacks policy, personal attacks on other editors, such as the one contained in your edit here[5] are unacceptable and may lead to your account being blocked. Nsk92 (talk) 12:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Love Makes the World Go 'Round because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Tentinator 07:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]