User talk:Clarence baladjay 13

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lagro High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lagro High School was changed by Clarence baladjay 13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948277 on 2012-05-14T02:36:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Bonadea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zhou Yu (talk) 02:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Bonadea. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Zhou Yu (talk) 02:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Zhou Yu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zhou Yu (talk) 02:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Clarence baladjay (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Clarence baladjay 13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I am good and I have beautiful drawings. Greet me Happy Birthday!Clarence baladjay 13 (talk) 02:45, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. Talk page accessed revoked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:04, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No. Wikipedia is for people who can act like grown-ups. We don't give priority to younger ones, and you're going to lose your talk page access.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]