User talk:Cityscaper101

Welcome!

Hello, Cityscaper101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 16:32, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please check sources before changing articles

Hello, I'm C.Fred. Your recent edit to the page Utah appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reference for St. George as the fastest-growing area clearly had it both listed in the table and ranked at #1. —C.Fred (talk) 16:32, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm Gtwfan52. I noticed that you made a change to an article, St. George, Utah, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 04:03, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SunTran has been accepted

SunTran, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 09:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

St. George, Utah Comment

I do not mean to discourage your further editing within Wikipedia, but I understand your frustration. I removed the content you added from St. George, Utah because it sounded promotional, like something I would find in a tourism brochure. This does not meet the Neutral point of view (NPOV) standards for Wikipedia. You mentioned Flagstaff, Grand Junction, and Salt Lake City as examples that you modeled your text after. While those articles are not the gold standard, their intros maintain a NPOV and in some cases the assertions made are supported by reliable, third party references (either at the end of the into sentence/paragraph or elsewhere in the body of the article). Some of this has already been pointed out before, such as in the Arts and culture (tagged in January 2003) which some of the detail you referenced to in your intro draws on. If you have any questions, or would like help rewriting the intro paragraph, please let me know. Barkeep^Chat/_$ 14:32, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Washington, Utah

I removed your edit to Washington, Utah because it was mostly unsourced personal opinion. Also, WP:USCITIES outlines that demographic data should come from the US Census. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:18, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cityscaper101. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cityscaper101. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]