User talk:Chmarkine/Archive 2

User SUL Box template changes

Hi. I created (ported) several of these, including at he, yi and lad. I updated all three—you had updated the Latin-alphabet version on lad, but not the Hebrew-alphabet version. At this point I don't quite remember which other ones I may have created, but do you know which languages you have updated already and which not? Thanks. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi! I updated these versions:

• ab, ace, az, bcl, be-x-old, da, dsb, en, eo, ga, hsb, id, it, lad, simple, yo, zh-classical

For the lad version, I only updated the first link but overlooked the other three. I didn't update he and yi versions because right-to-left scripts are so confusing for me. Most of other versions do not link to the toolserver, so they are left with no change. But I have no idea if I have checked all wikis (since there are too many). Thanks! Chmarkine (talk) 23:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lego Mindstorms NXT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Python. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HTTP/2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chrome. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

WP:PRURL

Your use of giving WP:PRURL as a reason to use protocol relative url is wrong. That is an essay. It has no consensus. It is not a policy or guideline. If somebody reverts one of these edits, do not revert back unless you talk to the other person. Other people have started doing the same thing you did and got in trouble for doing reverts. Bgwhite (talk) 06:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

@Bgwhite: Thanks for your reminding! I have changed the link in my edit summary to an old discussion. Chmarkine (talk) 08:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Ah yes, that is the discussion. Egads, has it been over a year since that thing. I'm getting old. Bender235 was the main driving force in that and he was the main person that was getting in "trouble". Well, he is a troublemaker, so it comes natural to him. :) Let's @Bender235: and both of us will know what the current status of this is. Bgwhite (talk) 09:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm a troublemaker? That's interesting. :D As for the question: I still believe Wikipedia should use HTTP Secure for external links whereever possible. It's a huge security plus (privacy and data integrity) that comes at basically no costs. Most of my copy-editing work over the past months has been coverting bare URLs linking to YouTube and Wayback Machine into templated ones ({{YouTube}}, {{Wayback}}), which should automatically make them HTTPS. --bender235 (talk) 09:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)