User talk:Chelsi2023

Frederick Reines

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Frederick Reines, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. This means the citations must be presented in the article text, as the end of the supported material per WP:PAIC.

In addition, sources must generally be secondary sources. We cannot cite one Wikipedia article as a source in another, as that is circular sourcing.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Hey.

Chelsi, you must not cite a Wikipedia article to another Wikipedia article. You can cite to the sources used in those other articles, but not the articles themselves. All your edits will have to be reverted. DS (talk) 20:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brandenburg Gate, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The French article doesn't give a source, & seems to be stupid enough to derive the information from Wikidata, which is frequently unreliable and again doesn't have a reference. - David Biddulph (talk) 13:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop!

You MUST stop your edits sourced only to Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources for guidance as to what does constitute acceptable sources. DuncanHill (talk) 14:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

A discussion concerning your edits

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.DuncanHill (talk) 14:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DMacks (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:ChelsiJ2919 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChelsiJ2919. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)