User talk:Chatboxingatnight

May 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 21:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

This source is a book review from the Wall Street Journal written by a third party source citing the world's third largest book publisher. Why are you obsessed with this page? You are verging on harassment. Chatboxingatnight (talk) 21:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm not the single purpose editor here. Stop adding promotional content. MrOllie (talk) 22:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The publisher is cited inside The Wall Street Journal, America's second largest newspaper. You need to cease your strange obsession with this page or you'll be reported. Stop your anti-female bias or you will be reported. Bias against female subjects is well documented by male Wiki editors. You can't bully people simply because you've been editing longer. Chatboxingatnight (talk) 22:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

You should go ahead and make that report, because I am not going to stop removing promotional content when I see it. MrOllie (talk) 22:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

You should stop deleting articles from major news sources. It's Orwellian and sexist. Chatboxingatnight (talk) 22:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Looking forward to seeing that report! MrOllie (talk) 23:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

You should really ponder why you feel the need to attack women and delete national news sources. Chatboxingatnight (talk) 18:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. MrOllie (talk) 22:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Wikipedia has a policy at Wikipedia:Civility and another one at Wikipedia:No personal attacks regarding behavior in interacting with other editors here. In fact, respect and civility in treatment of other editors is one of our five pillars of the community. Your referring to another editor as "obsessed" [1], having an "anti-female bias" [2], and being "sexist" [3] is not in keeping with these policies. Further violations of these policies will result in a block of your editing privileges. Comment on content, not the contributors. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 01:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Given that there is a well-documented anti-female bias, it is worth highlighting this behavior. It is not a personal attack but simply calling out problematic bias. In addition to deleting sources from multiple other articles from large national newspapers, this editor MrOllie says a book review article written by a secondary source from the country's second largest newspaper is "promotional content." This is false. From Gender bias on Wikipedia "A 2021 study found that, in April 2017, 41% of biographies nominated for deletion were women despite only 17% of published biographies being women.... Gender bias features among the most frequent criticisms of Wikipedia, sometimes as part of a more general criticism about systemic bias in Wikipedia ... After reviewing testimonies that ranged from microaggressions to direct attacks, the Wikipedia Board of Trustees voted in May 2020 to adopt a more formal moderation process to fight against harassment and to uphold Wikipedia's community standards. The foundation has been tasked to finish the draft of this plan by the end of 2020, and it will include banning users who participate in gender harassment, providing support and communities for all gender identities, putting more resources into the Trust and Safety Team, and more." Chatboxingatnight (talk) 18:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Noting there is bias in general is one thing. Associating it with a particular editor is an attack. See WP:ACCUSE. If you can make a clear case why you should be unblocked, and that unblock request is accepted, you can note your concerns...backed with evidence... at WP:AN/I. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)