User talk:Charles87

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Charles87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! SatuSuro 10:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Muhammad Albicho.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Muhammad Albicho.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article George Moussan has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I note the references were added, and that you always do add references as is proper. I see that the warning above was placed while you were in the middle of editing the article, 23 minutes after the first edit. To avoid this sort of problem , the best way is to add a ref at the very first edit. DGG ( talk ) 23:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation[edit]

I see you have been carefully and correctly adding references to other footballer articles, entered by some other editors who have been continuing to add such articles without making any effort at all to add any reference. This is very good work, for it saves the articles. It's a shame it's necessary, for of course those editors should have done it themselves--and I gave one of them who has been doing it persistently a personally worded warning. (and, btw, when you do add a reference to a PRODed or BLP PRODed articles, even if it's to one of your own articles, its OK & in fact desirable to remove the prod tag yourself --and substitute, if appropriate {{refimproveBLP}} tag. DGG ( talk ) 23:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More appreciation, and little bit about Wikipedia:Notability (sports)[edit]

Hi Charles87! Some of the football player articles you've (carefully and correctly) started may not meet the notability guidelines for soccer players - see WP:NSOCCER. Generally, an football player has to have either represented their country in any officially sanctioned senior international competition, or have made an appearance in a fully professional league. Players is junior national teams generally do not pass this test, which is why I have tagged some of the articles you have started as failing Wikipedia's "notability" guidelines. That said, all your contributions are nevertheless very much appreciated!--Shirt58 (talk) 11:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Mardig Mardigian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Omar Al Soma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Omar Al Soma for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omar Al Soma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Al Soma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After getting feedback from another admin, I've restored the page. Please do add more references to the article though, or it may be nominated for deletion again in the future. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs to be improved - the sooner the better - so that it meets our general notability guideline, which is more important than our football notability guidelin. This means adding "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." If you need any help, please let me know. Regards, GiantSnowman 11:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Hamdi Al Masri, Charles87!

Wikipedia editor Simeondahl just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great.

To reply, leave a comment on Simeondahl's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for January 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ismail Mahmoud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mohammed Al Wakid[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Charles87, thanks for creating Mohammed Al Wakid!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 1

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:21, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mahmoud Al Youssef[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Charles87, thanks for creating Mahmoud Al Youssef!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. /

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mohamad Afa Al Rifai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Tall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Omar Al Somah for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omar Al Somah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Al Somah until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Charles87. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing[edit]

Charles, I have been looking through your articles and they seem to match the editing patterns of several sockpuppets, such as User:GOALWAY, User:Yallader, User:Chikenlittle215 and others. I will mention this at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yalladar. I hope you are not the same editor, and that you have picked up bad habits from so many of the Jordanian sports articles being badly-sourced. Please see Thaer Krouma as an example. Please see WP:INLINECITE. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Charles87. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Charles87. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Mohammad Abadi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability/GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ali Alawi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Alawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Alawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Omar Al Hamwi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omar Al Hamwi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Al Hamwi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohamad Jaafar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohamad Jaafar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamad Jaafar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]