User talk:Carlp941

This is Carlp941's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

As a heads up, I'm basically never going to argue with anyone here. If you're here itching for a fight, you'll be disappointed and I won't respond. Demands not in line with policy will be ignored. With that said - I do respond to constructive criticism, notices of policy (and suggested compliance), and good faith attempts at collaboration.

So anyway

Yes, the bibliography needs formatting. Also more Polish sources if that is something you can easily do. If not, I am trying to come back to it. I am currently finishing up a big push to help someone get ready for a GA review but I am almost done.

I don't think you need to recuse yourself from Double genocide. That thread on my talk page blew up though, and is now at AE, so I think it isn't a good time to get too personal, as attention may drift over here. But it looks to me like towards the end you might have been trying to discuss at the talk page but I missed it because I was looking at ANI. The asynchronicity of Wikipedia is a problem. Willing to try that again if you are, and also, the topic needs people who can listen. Let's let the controversial AE die down -- it isn't about that page exactly, just about That One Guy explaining it to me all wrong, and not even that. I used the page as an example of his pattern of not listening. Thank you for not being that guy after all. Are you watching the Double genocide article? Ps: I was serious about Brazil. Elinruby (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I appreciate your extension of an olive branch, and it's very generous of you to think I shouldn't recuse myself. I am happy to edit and discuss in good faith to repair some of the damage I did in that discussion. I can get some more Polish sources, but I'll continue to move slowly to let the AE die down. Additionally I am watching the double genocide article!

Also I am very interested in the Brazil articles, please let me know how I can contribute! I'll look at some of the bolsonaro related stuff. Carlp941 (talk) 17:17, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited August von Mackensen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Group Mackensen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

friendly driveby edit

The Telegraph routinely flaunts basic journalistic practice <-- you mean "flouts" I think. In any event I think this is the wrong word, hth. Elinruby (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the headsup! I did mean "flout" and I agree, my wording is imprecise.

I'm without a laptop for the next few days. That discusssion is loooonnggg. so I'll edit that when I get back to my PC next week. :) Carlp941 (talk) 04:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]