User talk:Carl Bream

Welcome!

Hello, Carl Bream, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Manfred von Thigh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hermera34 (talk) 21:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manfred von Thigh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manfred von Thigh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hermera34 (talk) 21:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Man-Thigh Weekly

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Man-Thigh Weekly, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In veritas (talk) 00:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1516, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not spread hoaxes by inserting them into articles. In veritas (talk) 00:44, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1512. Please no more hoax references. In veritas (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1512. In veritas (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1516. In veritas (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Man-Thigh Weekly

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Man-Thigh Weekly, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Passengerpigeon (talk) 07:59, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:27, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Man-Thigh Weekly

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Man-Thigh Weekly, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AllyD (talk) 07:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manfred Von Thigh

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Manfred Von Thigh, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AllyD (talk) 07:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carl Bream (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are being unreasonable. Bots can write 50 paragraphs of information on some nob-head's theory of the first time somebody bit their own tongue, but when one dedicated individual attempts to inform the public about the origins of a successful website-magazine (and the brilliant man who founded it), you accuse me of going against Wikipedia's policy and seek to have me permanently removed from your website! This baffles me as 1 of 2 things would happen if someone saw the pages I created: 1 - They would assume that what is written is exactly what happened (in which case God help them) or 2 - They would get that this is the greatest joke to have ever been invented by man (in which case where is the problem?) If this could be classified as a hoax it could be understood, but it is so obviously a massive pile of horseshit (which was seen fit to have an entire page of on your website) that the fact that you are treating me like I'm some kind of vandal for inventing a website-magazine with a full history (which is more interesting than "some fucker invented Man-Thigh Weekly in a fit of drunken stupidity. It has five subscribers.") just seems ridiculously stupid to me. I know how INSANELY FUCKING stupid I am being right now, and maybe I should seriously seek psychological help but I genuinely (GENUINELY) feel furious that you have treated my joke like a crime. Need I remind you that I'm not expecting people to treat any crime I did as a joke. I didn't fire a gun in a bank and then get angry when I was sued, I spent 2-3 hours writing the lore to a website-magazine I made up in a fit of drunken stupidity and was blocked for it. I wasn't reuploading it because I wanted people to believe it was true, I did it because I'm a GIANT FUCKING MORON so leave me alone!! Carl Bream (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I suggest you walk away from Wikipedia for a short time and come back when you feel capable of making a calm unblock request - further ranting like this is likely to lose you the ability to edit this talk page. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:15, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.