User talk:CallmeDut

About Technoblade picture[edit]

Can you show me the explicit permission of the author about "he agress with repost freely the image".

And also, "the author agrees the free usage of the picture ONLY in Wikipedia" argument is not valid, is needed that the file can be freely usage for everyone in anywhere in the world for being usable in Wikipedia.

And, the picture needs to be published in a copyleft or public domain license that allows commercial usage and derivative works of it, for example, a CC BY, CC BY-SA, GFDL, WTFPL license, etc. Otherwise, it can't be used freely on Wikipedia.

You can upload also pictures according to fair use, but this kind of pictures can only be used in articles, and it usage is pretty strict and specific. You can read more abot this in WP:NFCC. Sr. Knowthing ¿señor? 23:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Technoblade (January 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:GNG and WP:ENT. YouTube is not a reliable source. Additional references in independent and reliable sources are necessary to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Technoblade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Technoblade, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CallmeDut! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 07:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]