User talk:Cablewoman

This is Cablewoman's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Cablewoman, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Cablewoman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome...

Hello, Cablewoman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Spinning Spark 12:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I noticed that you did two undos in a row at Planck constant to revert some vandalism. So that in the future you can do this in a single edit, I have given you the rollback permission. Rollback should only be used for indisputable vandalism as there is no opportunity to leave an edit summary. If you do not want the rollback tool, leave a note on my talk page and I will remove it. Thanks for all your good work. Spinning Spark 11:57, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to our good work. Cablewoman (talk) 08:53, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful of consecutive vandalism edits by different users

Hello, thanks for your efforts to revert vandalism. However, at the Civil engineering article, two vandalism edits were made in short succession, but you only reverted one of them. In my experience, tricks like that are becoming more common. If you encounter a similar situation in the future, manually revert the article to the last good version. Graham87 01:38, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those vandals are cunning... I will be on the watch... Cablewoman (talk) 08:53, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]