User talk:Cabe6403/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

NATASHA DUARTE

NOBODY IS SHOUTING I AM ACTUALLY TYPING THIS WITH A SMILEY FACE BUT MY COMPUTERS CAPITAL LOCK IS STUCK - SORRY FOR THAT. CAN YOU DELETE THE CONTENT OF THE LOG THEN PLEASE. CAN MY DAUGHTER DO A MUSICBIO? CAN I CHANGE THE PAGE NAME AND NOT CALL IT NATASHA DUARTE? THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE HER RECORD LABEL MAY PUT SOMETHING UP FOR NATASHA SOME OTHER WAY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.184.21.250 (talk) 10:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

There are 12 criteria listed at WP:MUSICBIO, go through those and tell me exactly which ones you believe apply to your daughter. Regarding the logs, as I said, I cannot remove those as it is a special tool that only few people have access to. I will continue to look into it on your behalf. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 10:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

SORRY I AM NOT SURE HOW ALL THIS WORKS SO I WILL JUST HOPE THAT YOUR ADMIN TEAM CAN DELETE THE PAGE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND I WILL LET MY DAUGHTER KNOW THAT I CANNOT CREATE A PAGE FOR HER. I DONT THINK ITS A GOOD IDEA TO HAVE A WIKI PAGE ANYHOW. NO NEED TO CREATE A NEW USER ID AS NATASHADUARTE IS BLOCKED NOW AND I WON'TBE USING ANY OTHER. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE AND HERES HOPING ALL CONTENT I ENTERED OR THE PAGE CAN BE DELETED. I WONT GET YOU THE INFBUT GOOGLE NATASHA DUARTE AND YOU WILL SEE ALL THE NEWSPAPERS, ETC. ALSO SHE WAS ON SONY'S DIVA 5 ALBUM. 124.184.21.250 (talk) 10:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi there, I have heard back from the Oversight team and they have declined to remove the deletion log. The Oversight facility is reserved for cases where the material in question containts libelous or personally-identifying information. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 14:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Feb 2013

Hello,

I would love to hear your opinion on this RfC request [[1]] cheers! Eng.Bandara (talk) 12:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

I've commented on the RfC Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

conduct dispute?

I'm just confused about the closure, but how was it conduct and not content? The conduct was there (illustrating some bad faith) but it was a content dispute - about page ownership and reverting content. No?--Львівське (говорити) 15:57, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Page ownership is a conduct issue. It seems like you are attempting to add content and simply being reverted and accused of "rmv nationalist trolling". Looks like someone is POV pushing and preparing to edit war. Besides, if the other user is refusing to discuss then there has been no previous discussion and DRN still isn't the right place. DRN is a voluntary place when both parties disagree on the content of an article, what you have is a conduct issue with the other editor. What I would do is try establish consensus for what you wish to add (make an RfC if necessary) and put it in if a consensus exists. If you are still being edit war'd you can take it further safe in the knowledge that you have consensus. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 16:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification --Львівське (говорити) 16:07, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

No problem, good luck with your dispute. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 16:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Cough, mumble...have you spell-checked your blurb recently?

"I've garnered a fair undertanding of policy and how things work here"

I was just wandering around and thought you might not have noticed that someone seems to have absconded with your...ah...S?

PhxJennifer, just being neighborly

PhxJennifer (talk) 22:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Haha, whoops. Fixed now, thanks! Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 14:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Folly Wildlife Rescue - Stub

Hi. I've been busy expanding the Folly Wildlife Rescue Trust article and wondered if it now qualifies to shake its stub status?  :) Thanks! Nunnsofunky (talk) 10:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I've removed the stub status as the article is now no longer a stub. I have a few concerns about the images. Are they all public domain/fair use appropriate? Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 10:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I'm no expert on image copyright, I'm afraid, but I did take all of the photographs myself. Is that what you mean? (Sorry - this is all new to me and I'm grateful for any advice!) Nunnsofunky (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, if you've taken them yourself and retain the copyright on the images (i.e. you didn't take them on behalf of the Trust as they likely retain the copyright in that case) you should move the images over to Commons, the correct place for them to be hosted rather than here on en.wikipedia. Have a look here: Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. I can help with any questions but I am also not an expert on copyright Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 11:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

I basically took the photographs to put on the Folly Facebook page, so I'm not sure whether or not that qualifies as "taking them on behalf of the Trust" ...? I am a Trustee myself, so will have a word with some of the others. I doubt they'll really mind either way, to be honest!  :) Anyway - thanks for the advice. I think I may need to gen up on the rules and regulations! Nunnsofunky (talk) 11:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Since you are familiar with this article, I'm appealing to you. I am a random editor who has nothing to do with the organisation but I have been watching this since AFD, and tried to help source it a little. As of today, it has been deleted. Is there anything that you can do to help the page? I think that asking the editor to jump through so many bureaucratic hoops to have the page seen is pretty harsh. I even boldly tried to undo the deletion but it didn't work. How many pages of Wikipedia are devoted to Pokemon ect. yet this article which was heavily linked to others and had beautiful image contributions is denied?24.0.133.234 (talk) 00:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for breakfast...

Ahhh...freshly baked brownie for breakfast....yum!

You're welcome!

PhxJennifer (talk) 14:40, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Redirects

I didn't even realize that the monobook-suite was trying to redirect using the Spanish wording. Good eye and thanks for fixing. ※ Sobreira ◣◥ (parlez) 15:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tianhui 1B, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dissolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Stick this on your barn

		The Newyorkbrad Dispute Resolution Barnstar
		Thanks for your mediation over the Map projection dispute -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 23:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

We'd like your opinion

A question for people who commented in the RfC at "Probationary Period" and "Not Unless". (Or feel free to reply on my talk page, if you prefer.) - Dank (push to talk) 19:23, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

DRN Jozef van Wissem

I see you're trying to sort out the parties. If you've not noticed it already, Jozefboys is an indef-blocked sock of Jozefvanwissem, and Bofs1, who hasn't edited since January, is probably him as well. Just FYI, best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed this after seeing the ANI independantly. Thanks for the FYI thought :) Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 17:01, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

You might want to close this based upon the "This noticeboard is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums." rule. See:

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#123.224.94.138

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Jozef van Wissem

Previous discussion: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive789#Jozef van Wissem --Guy Macon (talk) 17:28, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

--Guy Macon (talk) 17:28, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

I considered this however the COI dispute hasn't been touched in 6 days and the current ANI is essentially about the conduct of a user involved and not the content itself. If it devolves into conduct I will be closing it and directing everyone to the ANI or RfC/U areas. Until then, I'm willing to allow them to try focus on the issue at hand and thrash out a reasonable discussion Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 17:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Clerk

Hello again Cabe6403. Although we are impressed with your enthusiasm and performance at Wikipedia, we'd like to see you gather more experience before joining the Clerking team of the Arbitration Committee. We advise you to keep your hard work, polish a bit more your skills, and reapply in the next few months. Then, we'd me more than glad to welcome you :) I apologize for the late response, and thank you for all your contributions to this great project. Cheers. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 16:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for getting back to me. I'm sure I'll see you around :) Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 17:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Motion to close RFC/U

You have previously commented on Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Niemti.

As an outside editor, I have moved that this RFC/U be closed. If you wish to comment on the Motion to close, please do so here. Fladrif (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the deletion.

Thank you for deleting the category I created by mistake. I'd put a mispelling in the title and was unable to change it.Graham1973 (talk) 21:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I figured it was a simple mistake :) Keep on keeping on Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 21:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Motion to close RFC/U

You have previously commented on Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Niemti.

As an outside editor, I have moved that this RFC/U be closed. If you wish to comment on the Motion to close, please do so here. Fladrif (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the deletion.

Thank you for deleting the category I created by mistake. I'd put a mispelling in the title and was unable to change it.Graham1973 (talk) 21:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I figured it was a simple mistake :) Keep on keeping on Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 21:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Jose Antonio Vargas". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 10 April 2013.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 00:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Precious

spirits
Thank you for quality articles on a variety of spirited topics, touching fantasy, drink, music, for regular collaboration and dispute resolution, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Ha, this is awesome. Thanks :) It's probably the most personal wiki-thanks message I've ever got, makes it much more meaningfull than a standard template (not that those don't have a place too). Thanks for putting a smile on my face today :) I shall store it high on my page of special things. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 10:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

DRN organisers

Hello. I am just letting you know that I've made a proposal to create a rotating DRN organiser-style role that would help with the day-to-day running of DRN. As you are a listed volunteer at DRN, I'd appreciate your thoughts on this, and the other open proposals at DRN. You can read more about it here. Thanks! Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 00:12, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Cabe6403, we moved your Teahouse host profile

Hello Cabe6403! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just Check in and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 03:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse Answers

Hello, Cabe. Nice to meet you. I saw you answered question at teahouse. That's great. But you missed to post a talkback which you should do. So in future don't miss them, also happy editing and cheers! --Pratyya ^(Hello!) 09:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I don't quite follow what you mean by 'missed to post a talkback'? Could you clarify please Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 10:34, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I see the Teahouse talkbacks. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 10:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes Please don't miss them.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 17:26, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cabe6403. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Apps#Discussion.
Message added XapApp · talk · contribs 13:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DRN Lutici, Pomerania during the High Middle Ages

Do you have any objection if I close the dispute as failed and recommend they file at MedCom--Cameron11598 (Converse) 05:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for taking the DRN. No, I don't have any objections to that course of action and it's what I'd recommend. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 07:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

I looked over the dispute and it seems like a case of "I don't like it" to me not much we can do at DRN if they are unwilling to compromise ----Cameron11598 (Converse) 07:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Barnstar of Good Humor!
		Hello Cabe6403. You have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much.--Pratyya (Hello!) 14:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Scotch Egg

	Top of The Pile
	Scotish, proper Scotish or just South Scotland? Jeanphillips2013 (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Not quite sure what you mean but for reference, I'm Scottish and from Glasgow. Happy to answer questions on why I nominated your article for deletion if that's where you are going? Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 14:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Nothing todo with the pending deletion - just nice to see someone from my neck of the woods active on Wiki hence the flag :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanphillips2013 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Ah, no worries! Welcome to Wikipedia and I'm happy to help with any questions you may have about policies etc Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 15:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Cabe - quick one then, since you offered - What should I do to the equip4work company page to make sure it doesn't violate the G11? They are based in Dumfries ha :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanphillips2013 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

I've placed a quick template on your userpage which has some links which you may find interesting. The best way to avoid advertising is to make sure you write facts as reported by third parties. I.e. you may know that it is the first online only retailer but can you find a reliable third party source that states the same? The most important things are to make sure the article can be verified with reliable sources and is notable. Also, if you are connected with the company take a quick swatch of our conflict of interest policy. If you're not sure you can write an article in your userspace and have someone review it before it gets moved over to article space. Help with how to do this is at articles for creation or, feel free to ask me and I'll do what I can to assist. P.S. if you type 4 tildes (~) after your posts you will leave a signature so people know who is talking :) Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 15:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Jose Antonio Vargas, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:PhilKnight (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Cabe6403, we moved your Teahouse host profile

Hello Cabe6403! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just Check in and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 03:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Invesdor

That article looks vastly similar to one I tagged under G11 a month or so ago (and was promptly deleted). Just thought I'd let you know. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, I tagged it as A7 because it really isn't notable and doesn't make any claims to be so. A G11 tag would probably be just as valid, I just happened to go A7. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 09:16, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

• I agree, both are equally valid. If this gets recreated for a third time, I may go and request it to be SALTed, and/or the account to be blocked. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Removed Speedy Deletion

You added a speedy deletion tag to Adharana Charitable Trust. I removed this tag because this policy doesn't apply to educational institutions. I instead added the no context tag because the article doesn't provide sufficient context to gather an understanding on the topic.

As it was described as a charitable trust rather than an educational institution (which I don't believe it actually is) I applied the A7 tag. I think both tags are valid Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 15:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ZVV logo no text.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:ZVV logo no text.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2013

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2013, the project has:

• 158 Featured Articles
• 56 Featured Lists
• 7 Featured Topics
• 6 Featured Pictures

• 43 A-Class Articles
• 589 Good Articles
• 9 Good Topics

---

Content

• Changes to Featured and Good content
• News items and announcements

• Feature: Featured Pictures and why the project should focus on obtaining more
• Interview: JDC808

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment – talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • Video game images – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Start Snuggle

IRC office hours for wiki-mentors and Snuggle users

Hi. We're organizing an office hours session with the Teahouse to bring in mentors from across the wiki to try out Snuggle and discuss it's potential to support mentorship broadly. The Snuggle team would appreciate it if you would come and participate in the discussion. We'll be having it in #wikimedia-office ^connect on Wed. July 17th @ 1600 UTC. See the agenda for more info. --EpochFail^{(talk • work)}, Technical 13 (talk), TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:19, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

DRN needs your help!

Hi there. I've noticed it's been a while since you've been active at DRN, and we could really use your help! DRN is going to undergo some changes soon, so it'd really be great if our backlog is cleared before the start of August and we have as many people on board to help with the changes (they include a move to subpages and the creation of a rotating "co-ordinator" role to help manage things day-to-day. Hope to see you soon! Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 11:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Request for administering RfC

I have recently filed an RfC at the Talk:2012 Delhi gang rape case. I request you to please administer it and keep a watch over it. Thank you very much. TransVannian (talk) 08:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Cabe, I'd second that request. TV has structured the RfC to mention the victim's name prominently and repeatedly, which seems a violation of the DR/N resolution: that the name of the victim not be posted any more until we've come to a consensus on it. I attempted to remove the name of the victim pending further discussion, and was immediately reverted by TV. Your further input would be appreciated. -- Khazar2 (talk) 09:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi guys, I'm currently out and won't be back until later tonight (UK time) but I'll have a look then. In the meantime, TranVannian, I would suggest you leave the name off the article until the RfC has been concluded and assume good faith on the other parties that, should the RfC result in your favour, they will respect it. As such you should respect that it has not been resolved thus far. Cheers, Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 10:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to say this RfC went into meltdown pretty quickly. Your input on how it could be neutrally formulated would still be welcome, though. Thanks for your work at DR/N, btw, which I imagine is often pretty thankless. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Dhyanu Bhardwaj

sorry , I was not known that removing speedy voilates wikipedia's policy.Sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightning Dhyanu (talk • contribs) 13:46, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

@Lightning Dhyanu:: That's ok, please see my comment on the talk page of the article where I ask which criteria the individual meets and if it can be backed up by a reliable source. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

sign up. [redacted email]

First signing. Trying to figure this out. [redacted email] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yumfy (talk • contribs) 22:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

@Yumfy: When you wish to sign just put 4 tildes (~) like this: ~~~~ and it'll leave your signature. Also, I have redacted your email address, if you want it back feel free but remember, whatever you post on Wikipedia is public Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 07:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Moving content

Hey, thanks! When I realized about the mistake it was already fixed. Thanks a lot! ;)--Kippelboy (talk) 08:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I figured it was a simple mistake. Good luck with your wikiproject Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 08:53, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Ghost in the Shell DRN

Lucia Black's ban does not negate the fact that ChrisGualtieri and I still have a conflict over how the pages should be.—Ryulong (琉竜) 11:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Ah, my appologies, I misunderstood the dispute. You were correct to revert me Ryulong Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 11:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Plafony

Hello Cabe6403. I am just letting you know that I deleted Plafony, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. GedUK  11:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

No problem. I believe a different user already changed the tag to a more relevant one. Not speaking Polish I followed the link and thought it was for the company and not the product. Cheers Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 11:55, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Postpartum vertigo

Hi Cabe6430, and thanks for patrolling new pages. :) I just wanted to say that normally we leave at least 10-15 minutes before tagging new pages with A1 or A3, as the initial poster may be intending to expand their submission. I worry that tagging things as soon as they are created, like you did at Postpartum vertigo, might drive away potential contributors. By the way, have you checked out the essays listed at Template:Speedy deletion navbox? They cover this kind of thing in quite a bit of detail. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 12:59, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

@Mr. Stradivarius: Thanks for the message, I'll admit I was probably a bit quick off the mark with that tag. Cheers, Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 13:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Moving userboxes

Hi there, moving is not necessary but it's nice for centralization since I have quite a few others. I do apologize for any inconvenience that was caused by moving around the userboxes in the hierarchy. Do you know if a bot will fix the double- or triple-redirects, or does it need to be fixed by hand? CaseyPenk (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

I went ahead and fixed any double redirects I found -- please let me know if any more are outstanding. CaseyPenk (talk) 15:49, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

DRN

No, it is content as well. He believes his version is correct, we believe our version is correct. That is where the dispute arises. The conduct related to that is, I agree, a matter for ANI, however I want to avoid going there if I can do so. GiantSnowman 08:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

From the DRN listing
How do you think we can help? Explain to the user: The importance of using talk pages The importance of WP:CONSENSUS Reasons he should not/does not WP:OWN the article. He believes me to be a "vandal" so will not listen to my advice, however an independent party may get through to him and help resolve the situation.

What part of this is content related? The entire listing was about the conduct of another user. The conduct was related to content but the main issue remains conduct. Additionally, we require extensive discussion on the talk pages before a case is brought to DRN, something I did not see Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 08:38, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Edit: Appologies if this appears snappy. Reading it back it does seem a bit harsh. Personally I stand by my close in this case but I'd have no problem if you requested on the DRN talk page for another volunteer to review the case and consider a reopen Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 08:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

As I stated, he believes that his version of the article is correct, whereas myself and another user disagree. His poor conduct is a result of that, not the other way around. Extensive talk page discussion? He pretty much refuses to engage, and when he does it is hard to see what he is saying due to poor language skills - but look at User talk:Footwiks#List of FC Seoul players for more attempted resolution. I'll take this to ANI if I have to but I am trying to minimise the drama, not maximise it! GiantSnowman 08:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

If the user is refusing the engage in discussion then is there much chance he'll get involved with the DRN? DRN is a voluntary process and the volunteers have no power to impose sanctions, results or anything on the editors involved or the article. If someone refuses to engage with a DRN then their isn't really anything we can do. From the editors conduct I hightly doubt he'll engage. What I'd recommend is taking it to a relevant wikiproject first, get some more editors on your side and show you have a consensus. If he keeps reverting then he'll probably hit the 3RR. I've posted on the DRN talk page to have another voluteer take a look at the close Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 08:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Becasue DRN is a more formal environemnt than 3 editors at an article/talk page, and he is more likely to take the advice/guidance of an independent editor rather than me (who he views as "vandalising" 'his' article). If he refuses to engage with the DRN, then all the more evidence for an eventual ANI. If he does engage, then we can move forward. I've already taken it to a WikiProject (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 79#List of FC Seoul players) and received little-to-no assistance. GiantSnowman 09:01, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I understand your concerns, it can be frustrating when that happens. As I said, I stand by my close but I have no problem if one of the other DRN volunteers reviews it, feels otherwise and decides to re-open it. Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 09:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! GiantSnowman 09:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Tristar

I really thank you for calling attention to the problems with the Tristar articles. When I checked them before deletion, I found that the content was entirely copied from their web site, and I have deleted them accordingly, including the similar contributions to other articles, including the principal one. That one should be rewritten, but for such extensive copyvio, it's better to remove it before starting. Even had they not been copyvio, I would have listed them for deletion as promotionalism--the two tend to go together. You might want to see what I said at User talk:Carisab

I suspect that similar problems are present in at least half the pages about similar organizations. For any extensive page about an organization written in formal style, I find it's worth checking.

I'm glad we got this batch. I checked the other HCA articles too--some contain some promotionalism which I'm removing, but none are as bad as these. DGG ( talk ) 19:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

@DGG: No problem. When I come across this kind of stuff I tend to check the contribs of the user to see if they have multiple like this. It never occurred to me to check if they were a copyvio also, good catch! Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 19:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Andhra_Pradesh_PCPIR

hai sir, you requested to delete this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andhra_Pradesh_PCPIR but it doesn't like advertising or it doesn't stick to any private industry , but it explains about a region similar to Silicon valley, as I'm new to wikipedia articles I can create as efficiently so need help to improve pages like this,so I request you to withdraw from speedy deletion, thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravitejakarri (talk • contribs) 15:48, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Mail

Hello, Cabe6403. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

— TransporterMan (TALK) 14:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Typos

Ha! Thanks for the beer. One has to laugh when these things happen - especially when it's something that could happen to anyone simply by hitting one key fractionally before the other. Not sure Ms Karnagy would appreciate it as much though. Mabalu (talk) 09:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Indeed, it's rare that a typo produces something amusing but when it does you have to at least chuckle. I always make sure to check my speller and gramming Cabe6403^{(Talk•Sign)} 09:09, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Does the age change on someone's Wiki page automatically on their birthday?

Hi Cabe,

I created a Wiki page for Mavis Amankwah. Her birthday is coming up in a few weeks. I was wondering if Wikipedia automatically changes the age on every birthday or if it waits for it to be officially changed by a Wiki editor or user.

Can you let me know please?

Thanks, Kamran Assadi 12:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamranassadi (talk • contribs)

Hi there Kamranassadi, I see on the page you are using the {{birth date and age}} template so, yes, Wikipedia will automatically change the age on the birthday of the individual. If you click through to the template you'll be able to see the syntax to change how it works if you're interested but it appears to have been set up correctly in this case. Cabe6403^{(Talk•Sign)} 12:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)