User talk:CIS/Archive 3

Under the Umbrella Tree

• Hi there, i couldn't help but notice one of your other username was PatrickA. Aren't you the same guy who was a member of the UTUT Yahoo group and you had your own UTUT website? Well, from the group. The group seems very dead, but anyway, i am wondering if you are going to update your UTUT stuff, and perhaps some video clips of the show? I have made my own UTUT website now (The unofficial one), and feel free to join the forum there.

• Hello, and yes I am the member from the UtUT group, and I am the one who made the website. Coincidentally, I just finished ordering the "Under the Umbrella Tree Volume 1" DVD from Cinerio Entertainment, and already have some opening titles downloaded to the computer from my VHS tape. I would love to download the VHS videos to the net but I have dial-up as specified on my user page :(... it would take ages. If you wan't a copy of the new DVD I'm getting I'd gladly send you a ripped copy on DVD or you can order it yourself at Cinerio. Send me an email through Wikipedia and I'll respond with my personal email address and we can talk mailing the DVD. Thanks for your interest. I'd also like to know that website address for your group!. — ^{`</sup>CRAZY`(lN)`SANE<sup>`} 05:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Well it's a small world. My website address is http://www.angelfire.com/droid/undertheumbrellatree, it's not a group though. And i've given it a UTUT forum, which you can gladly register. It's very new!

Comments

• Bye - good luck :-) Let us know when and if you are back.--Arktos ^talk 21:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Aye, good luck :). -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:01, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA WP:100). I guess infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia. With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you. (Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp laudare 01:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm so sorry. I do hope you come back sometime. alphaChimp ^laudare 01:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you all

Thank you all for the fond farewells, I appreciate them dearly. It is my birthday today and I have momentarily returned to the Wikipedia as a "birthday treat". I see the Spring holiday article is fairly quiet and things are running smoothly between the editors I'm acquaintanced with. I've noticed your username change as well, AYArktos—good luck with that. I hope I may one day be able to permanently return to the Wikipedia, and until then I bid you all adieu, and I will be enjoying my "big 18th"! Haha!. — ^{`</sup>CRAZY`(lN)`SANE<sup>` [discl.]} 03:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Happy birthday then.

In that case, have a happy birthday and I hope to see you back here editing soon. JoshuaZ 04:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Happy birthday greetings from me too. Regards from Australia in the spring time Golden Wattle ^talk 11:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: your comment

CIS, thank you for the kind words. I see now that I have returned that you are away. Good luck with resolving whatever is transpiring. — Knowledge Seeker দ 21:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Moving articles

Do not paste an article in a new name; this loses the history as well as the history of the talk page (and I note you didn't even copy the talk page) Use Move. If there is a history at the destination, this will not work and you must contact an admin (WP:RFPM) to do the move. Thanks - KillerChihuahua^?!? 09:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Greetings from CIS!

Welcome back. What makes you think I'm on break? Powers ^T 12:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and as regards Winter holiday greetings, if you're going to redirect terms such as Season's Greetings and Happy Hanukkah to this article, it really ought to mention them. (WP:REDIRECT says not to redirect users to a page where they can't find the information they're searching for.) Powers ^T 12:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

File:ChristmasPuddingFlaming.JPG

Thank you for your greetings. I hope you have a pleasant wikiholiday (ie contributing here). I also hope you have a great Christmas and New Year. I am looking forward to Christmas and am busy getting ready. We are in the middle of a drought but otherwise all looks well from this part of the world. It is hard to imagine winter and a white Christmas. Part of our celebrations involve flaming a Christmas pudding, which I understand is not common in the US - not sure about Canada. It is a UK tradition. Here is a picture of one of my puddings from a few years ago - unfortunately my camera doesn't always photograph the colour blue so well but you probably get the idea. It tastes terrific and is eaten with brandy butter also known as hard sauce. Regards Golden Wattle ^talk 18:56, 7 December 2006 (UTC) (formerly known as AYArktos)

Your input sought

You must have had some run-in with Pmanderson before his last RfA. He's now up again, and I've also been subjected to his rude attacks and wikilawyering, including his recent 3RR. I don't believe he's ready yet, or if he truly has the temperament. Your comments? Skyemoor 05:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Christmas

Hi, you've been helping with this article so I wanted to drop you a note. User:Kauffner has recently made many (30) changes without prior discussion, including the deletion of well-sourced material that was added to the article by consensus. I have started a new section to discuss these changes here and I hope you will join in. Thanks Doc Tropics 17:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Kmart Holiday.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kmart Holiday.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 09:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

-- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 09:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Ceyockey RfA

A generic but nonetheless warm "thank you" for your generous words of support in my RfA. I'm glad that you affirmed Radiant's nomination and I'll be measured in my use of the cleaning closet's contents. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 22:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Forked article

Hi CrazyInSane. Do you still need User:Darwiner111/Britney Spears? If not, would you consider tagging it for speedy deletion? Thanks. ×Meegs 10:22, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Template

You asked for a dialogue template letting users know that the post that started it all was on a dif. page, "One template that I think would be useful is something one would add when discussing on user pages. For example, if I and User:Bob were having a conversation, he would first leave a message on my talk page. As courtesy, when I respond, I post the response at his talk page (so he gets the "new messages" warning). However, when I post the comments on Bob's talk page, I could insert a template that would read: "This discussion originated at User talk:CrazyInSane", to allow for easy access to the rest of the conversation. What does everyone think?. — `CRAZY`(IN)`SANE` 18:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)"

I was wondering if this is what your talking about (if not just tell me and I can change it). --Danielfolsom 07:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Macysxmas.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Macysxmas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Flight175.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Flight175.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you for one month for using the sockpuppets OLP1999 (talk · contribs) and RunningAway (talk · contribs) to evade your history of edit warring over BCE and CE. The length of this block is based on your previous blocks. Khoikhoi 01:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Not to sound like a sockpuppet myself, but i've known this user quite awhile, and while the users you've blocked do seem to share similar attitudes and editing styles with Crazy, I don't see a CheckUser on Crazy or one of his possible sockpuppets anywhere, or in the CheckUser archives. Homestarmy 02:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I would also like to know if a checkuser confirmed this. JoshuaZ 03:17, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

In Memorian

You've got quite a list of recently deceased family members. I'd peform a few health tests to make sure you don't have any inherited genetic diseases, since in the last decade you've lost quite a few people who died young.

Image:Playboy March 2005.jpg

Hello, CrazyInSane. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Playboy March 2005.jpg) was found at the following location: User:CrazyInSane/Hilton. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Target Xmas.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Target Xmas.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Jeee

I have nominated Jeee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. meshach (talk) 08:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CBCPEI.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CBCPEI.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ewan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ewan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Father_Albin.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Father_Albin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 14:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Elementary Schools of PEI

Please read WP Education in Canadan and User:Eusebeus/School Notability regarding school notability in regards to Tignish Elementary School and St. Louis Elementary School . There should be some secondary or supportive WWW links besides the WWW school main article for references or citations in the Wikipedia encyclopedia article. SriMesh | talk 03:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Prince Edward Island

Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Prince Edward Island ! The WikiProject Prince Edward Island is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Prince Edward Island. We look forward to welcoming you to the project! Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 03:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

OLP

Yeah, they are by far my favorite band. I started listening to them around late 2006/early 2007, but knew of them because I used to be a huge wrestling fan, so obviously I was a fan of "Whatever." Once I started listening to them, 4am and a few others sounded oddly familiar. I'm hoping their new album can compare with Naveed through Spiritual Machines. SupermansDead (talk) 23:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, haha, I've actually seen you on there. I registered a little bit before you did, my username is MindsOnLoan. SupermansDead (talk) 18:31, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

My bad, I haven't had a chance to get on in a few days and I just saw your message, and as you've probably seen, that's where I orginially got the info, lol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SupermansDead (talk • contribs) 02:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Please Refrain

You're lucky I have no agenda, lol. I was unaware that Wikipedia officially states both. I was only aware of standard scholarly practice. However, I would go one step further and state that since Wikipedia DOES officially use both, the context should set the terminology. A Christian article, for instance, should NOT use CE and BCE. First -- thank you for the pointer. Second... you'll gather more bees with honey... "please refrain" is less friendly than something like, "thanks for your eagle eye on the article. Actually, Wikipedia officially recognizes both AD/BC and CE/BCE, and only says that it's inappropriate to change from one to the other without reason. Since the subject matter is 'Christianity' we should stick with the terms most familiar to people reading the article: AD and BC. But stick around and keep helping!" Now, THAT would have been a more effective note. So, friendly reminder... some people have egos around here. I DO appreciate your help with the pointer. Just trying to help you avoid some conflict you don't need in the future. Best.Tim (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

No problem -- besides, my initial editing was "robotic"! ;-)Tim (talk) 20:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:OLP Dreamland.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:OLP Dreamland.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of pastors at St. Simon & St. Jude Church

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of pastors at St. Simon & St. Jude Church, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 10:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Canadian Flag on CSI Show

Greetings! I was the one who put the flag of Canada on the country of origin section on the article CSI (Not Miami or New York, just Las Vegas). This was done because the show was made by a combined effort of Canadian and American television companies, not just American. The Canadian one I mention is Alliance Atlantis, feel free to look them up. Adding the flag back until you convince me otherwise. Thank you for your time, Cheers! Bretonnia (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC).

I've left the Canadian flag icon, but removed "CTV" as an original channel. CBS is the sole original channel for CSI. — ^{`</sup>CRAZY`(lN)`SANE<sup>`} 00:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:CrazyInSane.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CrazyInSane.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK^{Reply? on my talk page, please} 03:04, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Big Brother (U.S.)

Hi, I reverted one of your edits on Big Brother (U.S.) because it deleted two references that the article needed. Also while CBS is carried in Canada on cable/satellite providers it is a United States network and most shows that air on CBS, ABC, NBC & Fox are purchased by Canadian networks to air in Canada free to air & on cable/satellite. Global in Canada is a network available to most Canadians with/without cable/satellite. Also the CRTC in Canada has a simultaneous substitution or simsub rule which protects Canadian networks. This means that since Global owns the Canadian rights to Big Brother (U.S.) they can (and do) force cable/satellite providers to block access to the CBS signal by either replacing the CBS' feed with Global's feed or block out CBS for the duration of the program. So that is why Global is noted at the Canadian broadcaster on the article. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 02:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Canadian broadcasters

Thanks for cleaning up the categories for television series broadcasters. You are correct in that categories should only be applied for networks that are involved in production, rather than just broadcasting. However, please note that we do not list US networks as broadcasters in Canada; that is not the established convention for international listings. While FOX, NBC, and the other US networks are available in Canada, they do not broadcast there and do not consider Canada part of their market. Thanks. --Ckatz^chat_spy 18:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply. Keep in mind that we're describing who can carry a show in a particular region, rather than simply being a TV listings service. Otherwise, we would have to track down and report every signal available everywhere. For example, if we say that ABC is a broadcaster for Ugly Betty in Canada simply because the network is available on cable, we would also have to say that City is a broadcaster in the United States because their over-the-air signal can be received south of the border. (Try selling that on the UB page!) This is definitely not a question of "protecting" the Canadian broadcaster; that is done by the CRTC through the substitution rules (i.e. CTV takes over NBC's cable channel during Heroes). What we write on Wikipedia isn't going to affect that. Nor is it unique, given that Canadian signals overlaps the US, US and Mexican signals overlap, etc. (Just think what it must be like in Europe, with so many different national broadcasters within a much smaller area!)

As for your dislike for Canadian broadcasters, please keep in mind that there is a lot of production going on in Canada. While much of the prime time schedule may be dominated by US content (due to our proximity to the US), much of the content on the Canadian cable channels originates in Canada. (Don't forget about major US series such as Smallville, Battlestar Galactica and many others that are produced in Canada.) --Ckatz^chat_spy 18:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

With regard to your latest post, I'll again reiterate that NBC is not the broadcaster in Canada. The mere fact that signals cross borders does not change this fact, and I doubt very much that you would get any support if you attempted to add CTV, CBC, City or Global as "US" broadcasters for a series just because their signals were available across the line. As for the Super Bowl commercials text, it is not especially notable, given that it is no different from any other US show that airs on a Canadian network. Look, you've expressed a dislike for Canadian broadcast regulations, and that is fine. However, you cannot let that dislike colour your contributions to the encyclopedia. --Ckatz^chat_spy 05:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not restore the "Chuck" text without further discussion; I would suggest that you seek input from the Television project if you are not satisfied with my explanation. As well, I have initiated a discussion on the "Super Bowl" page to determine what consensus is with regards to that text. Again, please do not restore it before that discussion concludes. Thank you. --Ckatz^chat_spy 05:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Seven Pounds

Hi, I partially reverted a couple changes you made to the lead section. First, "Will Smith stars" is more active-sounding than "It stars Will Smith". Also, for the coding you see between "December" and "19" in "December 19", this is a non-breaking space which is used for month and day; see more information here: WP:NBSP. Just wanted to explain these edits! —Erik (talk • contrib) 15:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Reverting Obama against consensus

I reverted this edit. Barack Obama is a controversial article that is on probation. That means it is especially important to be attentive to discussions on the talk page, including archives. There was a lengthy discussion on the issue you reverted, with a consensus for the infobox to include the information you removed. No single opinion takes precedence over group consensus, especially on this article. Please do not revert again without raising the issue on the talk page and waiting for a change in consensus. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:OLP Live 8.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:OLP Live 8.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 13:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Source has been noted. Thank you. — ^{`</sup>CRAZY`(lN)`SANE<sup>`} 13:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:OLP Live 8.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:OLP Live 8.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 13:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Template:FV

Hey, that's cool. Thanks for correcting me! :) Viriditas (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:OLP Live 8.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:OLP Live 8.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 15:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:OLP 2009 press.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:OLP 2009 press.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 15:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Chase Meridian merge

Hello, there is a proposal to merge an article you recently discussed here. Ryan4314 (talk) 22:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Burn Burn partial cover.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Burn Burn partial cover.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Your unjustified insinuation

FYI, please do not make inaccurate presumptions about your fellow editors. (This is in regards to your utterly inappropriate edit summary "I'd appreciate if you'd stop stalking my edits".) FYI, I've over 6 000 pages on my watchlist, and no interest whatsoever in "following" you. I do, however, resent the insinuation that I should not fix errors just because they are your edits. Please keep that in mind before making such claims in the future. --Ckatz^chat_spy 15:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

FYI, your edit was reverted because it failed the requirements of the disambiguation guidelines. Furthermore, I did investigate first; despite the occasional use in the media, the "BAM" term does rate a mention in the Wikipedia article about Obama, further suggesting that disambiguation is unnecessary. Finally, your use of bold text was also contrary to the guidelines. Next time, please ask first instead of making unjustified accusations, as it would save us both a lot of time and effort. --Ckatz^chat_spy 16:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

If you are convinced that this entry is worthwhile, I would strongly suggest that you first inquire at the actual article, to see if the editors there feel the name is sufficiently notable to warrant inclusion in that article. The fact that it is not even mentioned there is a good indication that disambiguation is not required. --Ckatz^chat_spy 16:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)