User talk:CFCAko

November 2007[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Couples for Christ, you will be blocked from editing. Boznia 05:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've got all night. :) --Boznia 05:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

CFCAko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

74.0.253.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism-only account

Blocking administrator: Sandahl (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are blocked directly.— SQL ^{Query me!} 06:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CFCAko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Sandahl, I was not vandalizing the article of Couples for Christ. I am just protecting it from people who are diescrediting its good name. These people are not even authorized by the Internationa Council to make such statements. Please consider unblocking my IP and I will try talking to these people. Thank you and God Bless.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia publishes verifiable information; protecting the reputation of a business or deferring to users with a conflict of interest is not what we do. You do not appear to understand these policies yet, so an unblock would be inappropriate. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CFCAko (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Sandahl, I was not vandalizing the article of Couples for Christ. I am just protecting it from people who are diescrediting its good name. These people are not even authorized by the Internationa Council to make such statements. Please consider unblocking my IP and I will try talking to these people. Thank you and God Bless.

Decline reason:

reason — CFCAko 06:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Sandahl, I will have to dispute your lack of no reason to further unblock my IP address. I will see to it that you loose your admin rights for your abusive action. Thank you.

Your threats are not appropriate, and they are also ridiculous. The community is not going to remove admin privileges from someone who is appropriately enforcing the guidelines at the say-so of a user who does not yet understand them. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]