User talk:BrokenFrame532

August 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm FrederalBacon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Master Chief (Halo)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. FrederalBacon (talk) 00:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Master Chief (Halo). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FrederalBacon (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Master Chief (Halo), you may be blocked from editing. FrederalBacon (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Master Chief (Halo). FrederalBacon (talk) 00:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the world needs to know that master chief is top g BrokenFrame532 (talk) 00:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 00:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: Sock was registered already FrederalBacon (talk) 00:27, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Rubano (August 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See Referencing for Beginners and the instructions on footnotes. In-line citations are required in biographies of living persons. Please revise this draft with properly formatted footnotes before resubmitting. You may ask for advice on references at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Rubano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrokenFrame532! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]