User talk:Bramnickatriot

October 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to George Ariyoshi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: George Ariyoshi was changed by Bramnickatriot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864394 on 2024-10-20T02:52:06+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:52, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Antony Armstrong-Jones, 1st Earl of Snowdon. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 00:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images

All of your images are violations of copyright, and they're directly taken from Getty Images. Wikipedia has to be in the public domain or Under Creative Commons License, and taking copyrighted images directly violates Wikipedia policy. For example, just because there is a color image of MLK, you can't just change it. I've been wanting to change MLK to https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/the-second-seige-petersburg-va/7wFkK-eaRdc3Tg?hl=en for a long time, but it is a copyrighted image and cannot be used. So stop uploading images until you understand the policy before being banned Wcamp9 (talk) 22:20, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The images are in the public domain, I have been unable to find any copyright for the images of Lawrence Schiller. Also that image should be in the public domain as it has been over 60 years since publication, try to find out if its had its copyright renewed. @Wcamp9 Bramnickatriot (talk) 00:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wcamp9 Just checked, guess what? THE IMAGE YOU WANT IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN!!!!!!!!!!! Bramnickatriot (talk) 00:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, go upload it, can be found https://www.buzzfeed.com/gabrielsanchez/incredible-and-rare-color-pictures-from-the-life-of-mlk and notify me when it is posted Wcamp9 (talk) 00:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wcamp9 Uploaded a high quality version of the image. Bramnickatriot (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Available on my user page Bramnickatriot (talk) 00:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide any evidence that these images were published? These images require to see that it was published without a notice on the paper or the image. Otherwise, your images would be copyvios as Schiller is still alive. reppop^talk 23:41, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image you deleted didn't need to be published as it was taken in 1960, instead it would have required for there to have been a renewal of copyright which is not there. Bramnickatriot (talk) 22:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/the-second-seige-petersburg-va/7wFkK-eaRdc3Tg?hl=en

This Image Bramnickatriot (talk) 22:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would need proof that it was published in an issue that hadn't had it's copyright renewed (of which there is only one, the 28 Nov 1960 issue). Doesn't really help that the information directly states that it is still copyrighted by Time with only personal non-commercial use permitted. Also, "didn't need to be published as it was taken in 1960" is false as c:COM:Hirtle chart states that it should be published without a copyright notice to be in the public domain, unpublished works are PD 70 years after the death of the author (for Sochurek, it would be 2064).

I see your new upload, please remember that within the template itself, it says "This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1929 and 1963." reppop^talk 02:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Told You

You were an inexperienced editor, and you should know more about copyright issues before you post copyrighted images to this place, Wikipedia Wcamp9 (talk) 03:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]