User talk:Bp908/sandbox

Abstract should not have a heading. It just shows up at the top.
"The skin lesions may become a cosmetic concern in the future, since the treatment with cortisone cream will only help with the itching." - confusing. I'm struggling to understand what you're trying to say here.
Nice overall summary in abstract.
Link terms to other pages. Some things, like hemoglobin, you can just link and not define on your page.
Why is hemosiderin in symptoms and not mechanisms?
There are a number of awkward sentences and minor grammar issues. Get some help with editing, if possible.
Other than the missing recent research summaries and some linking and editing, this looks really promising. Well-cited, detailed, well thought out.

--73.110.78.2 (talk) 04:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Taneisha- Abstract: The summary was good you provided a concise summary, definition and key features. The only thing I suggest is provide statistic or epidemiology of this condition. Diagnosis: Explain cut off values for tests performed in diagnosing this condition if applicable Treatment and Prognosis: List the statistic on how rare T-lymphoma is associated with your topic. Recent Research: provide a short summary for each link shared. Overall good job!

The summaries for the both nice and straight forward, good work. I would suggest to add "links" to other wiki pages within those sections along with the others. There are a few grammatical errors to correct. I also suggest on adding some "media" whether it be tables or even pictures, I think it will add a lot to the page. Each section has great information, and is cited well. keep up the good research and the page will turn out great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdesai93 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC) PavanDesai — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdesai93 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]