User talk:Boyarty

Welcome!

Hello, Boyarty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Alex Daniel, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Glenfarclas (talk) 05:14, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Alex Daniel

I have nominated Alex Daniel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Daniel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Glenfarclas (talk) 05:14, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeffrey Francis Kirby

The article Jeffrey Francis Kirby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Lots of references but most are either self-published or are interviews. There's no references from third-party non-affiliated sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, thanks for randomly targeting my article and getting it deleted, even though there are countless articles on Wikipedia on less notable topics with much poorer-written content. This is why Wikipedia has trouble attracting new editors. Keep up the great work! Boyarty (talk) 00:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeffrey Francis Kirby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Francis Kirby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Francis Kirby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A word of friendly advice, Wikipedia is like everything else in life, you need ot spend a little time studying how it is done, and to learn the rules under which this encyclopedia is written. You are welcome to edit here, but you are unlikely to be effective unless you take time time to learn how we evaluate evidence and what constitutes a good article. Not ot mention the little things, like how to footnote and link to articles in reliable sources. That said, we truly can use good editors, I hope that you will put in the effort necessary to become one.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]