User talk:BlitzShock

The talk page of BlitzShock on Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hi BlitzShock! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arkles Bay

Hello, BlitzShock

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dan arndt, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Arkles Bay, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dan arndt}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

Hi, thanks for asking about the Arkles Bay deletion. The article has been expanded by another user, and it is not needed to be deleted anymore. Thanks!BlitzShock (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2021 (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dan arndt (talk) 06:47, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Twin Coast Discovery Highway moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Twin Coast Discovery Highway, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 12:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for coming here on my talk page! This morning, I expanded the article, I included lots of info, about the route and added a table with major junctions in it. Only problem is that it's hard to find independent sources that have proper information about the Twin Coast Discovery Highway, so I've left it up to other users to find. I might try to find sources on my own and add some citations, at the moment I've put one citation on the page, only independent source I could find that has proper information about the road, so if anyone else could find anymore, that would be much appreciated. I've also applied for the draft to be published. Thanks! BlitzShock (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2021 (talk) 21:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

I am back from my inactivity

I am going to be working on Wikipedia articles again, I had exam week, however it has been finished and I'm ready to come back to the wiki and do some editing. BlitzShock (talk) 04:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC) BlitzShock

Redvale, New Zealand

Hi BlitzShock, welcome to Wikipedia. I just saw your new article on Redvale, New Zealand on the NPP live feed, and I'm looking at the sourcing of it. All articles should be able to pass our notability guides, for populated places this means showing either that they are legally-recognised populated places, or that there are notable because of multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. The sources in this article are:

• The New Zealand topo map. This confirms that Redvale exists, but provides no evidence of legal recognition and is not significant coverage of the site. Maps cannot be used to show the notability of a topic per WP:NGEO.
• Geotargit.com - this appears to be algorithm-generated content/a Google Maps skin. Google Maps is not a reliable source, nor are algorithm-generated-content websites.
• A listing for a camera on the NZ Transport Agency website. This is evidence fo the existence of a camera, but not of the community.
  

As such I'm not sure this does meet our guidelines and maybe you can help me understand how it does.

Do you think there's some other sources out there that could be used on top of these sources to better highlight that this is a notable topic? Ideally the article should have something showing e.g., the history of this place, sourced to reliable news media, books, academic sources etc. I see from a Google Books search that Redvale was covered in the 1957 Wise's New Zealand Guide as a "rural locality", but I can't see the full listing, but maybe something can be done with that? This book says Redvale is home to one of Auckland's landfills but it doesn't look like significant coverage. Looking at news sources I see coverage of COVID-19 outbreaks in Redvale (especially that influencer party) and also coverage of the landfill site there (which appears to be getting full, and also appears to be a source of power).

What I'm getting here is that this probably is a notable topic, but this can't be seen yet from the sourcing in the article as it stands. FOARP (talk) 09:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for coming onto my talk page, and I will try to replace the sources with much better sources about it. It will be difficult to find sources, but I will try. There isn't a whole lot of information about Redvale unfortunately online, but I might see if I can find a book or something related to any sort of information that has Redvale information in it, and maybe add some information to the source that way. Thank you! BlitzShock (talk) 20:26, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

No problem. I think if you just put in a bit about the fact it used to be a rural locality, is now home of half the rubbish in Auckland, maybe something about the COVID outbreak there, you'd be getting a long way towards having an obviously notable article. FOARP (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, I might do that, and it'll improve it BlitzShock (talk) 22:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Good stuff. Like it - it tells you something about the place so you know what it is. There are way too many articles on Wiki about towns/villages that barely tell you anything. FOARP (talk) 14:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Word use in an edit

Hi I saw the edits that you made to Greenhithe, New Zealand and I think that they are good useful edits. Thanks for that. However, I'm not really sure that it is appropriate to describe Greenhithe as a "western suburb" as it is located in the north and is generally considered to be a northern or northwestern suburb. I think that you may have been trying to say that it is in the western north shore, however, this isn't particularly clear and could perhaps be reworded. Cheers. MangoMan11 (talk) 10:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for pointing out the error I made, I will change it and I will try pay more attention to errors like that in the future. Thanks! BlitzShock (talk) 18:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twin Coast Discovery Highway has been accepted

Twin Coast Discovery Highway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 17:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much for accepting my page! I spent a decent amount of time working on it and some other people did too. Thank you very much for turning it into a real page! BlitzShock (talk) 23:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome. Seems like an interesting route. There are other sources that could be added, but they're paywalled and I was not able to access, but hopefully some others local editors can to flesh it out. Have a great day. Star Mississippi 15:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battery (song) (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Novem Linguae was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battery (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Battery (song), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 09:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, BlitzShock! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Demographics

I have noticed you adding links to religions and ethnicities to the demographics that I've supplied for New Zealand geographical articles. I have (rather belatedly) upgraded my script to do this automatically. An example can be seen at Stanmore Bay. If you have suggestions for further improvements, please feel free to suggest them (I'll watch your talk page for any reply). If I have inadvertently overwritten your improvements on other articles, let me know which and I'll regenerate the sections. Over the next year or two, I will be refreshing the demographics for the rest of the country from Hibiscus Coast south. I probably won't go back to refresh them again on area further north, until the 2023 census figures are available.-gadfium 04:36, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Suicide Note (song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 07:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Metallica. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 23:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

• Hey, sorry about that edit. At the time, I thought that they needed to be separated. The thing is now I know that they shouldn't, it should only be separated if there were multiple lead guitarists/singers/backing vocalists. I won't do it again unless it's an article where they properly need to get separated. BlitzShock (talk) 01:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

No, it's only necessary when you have some members who perform backing vocals and some who don't. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 06:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battery (song) has been accepted

Battery (song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much, I am very grateful that my draft has been published. Thank you very much and have a nice day. BlitzShock (talk) 23:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Welcome Home (Sanitarium) (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Welcome Home (Sanitarium) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Welcome Home (Sanitarium)

Hello, BlitzShock. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Welcome Home (Sanitarium), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 28 May 2023 (UTC)