User talk:BlankkSpace629

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Koestlin, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T) 15:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, BlankkSpace629, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

ABA League JTD

added a link pointing to League

Olja Luetić

added a link pointing to Lamp

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arival Bank for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arival Bank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arival Bank until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 09:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlankkSpace629 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. Haven't been on wikipedia for a long time, and today I saw a notice about deletion of my article and instant blocking. I take it something has changed? I don't see anywhere that I've had time to violate?

Decline reason:

We believe you are a sockpuppet account of another user who has been banned by the Wikimedia Foundation from all wikis it administers, not just this one. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BlankkSpace629 (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ublock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlankkSpace629 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I cannot accept the reason above. I don't know who believe in what and so on. I still didn't understand why I was blocked. Is it about my page which is listed on articles for deletion? Please unblock me and explain why you think I violated something? Especially after six month of being out of wikipedia

Decline reason:

We've explained why you are blocked. Please read WP:GAB to understand how to write a reasonable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.