User talk:BillyBob125TheEditor

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

-- The Anome (talk) 10:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BillyBob125TheEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20987 was submitted on Mar 23, 2018 19:27:47. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BillyBob125TheEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel I was unblocked fairly by The Anome and my name did not violate any rules. I wasn't trying to attack, threaten or troll anyone on this site. I just had poop in my name because I create YouTube Poops on my channel BillyBob 125. Not because I was trying to troll people. If I was named something like "NiggerDickz69" then I would completely understand the ban but it's not that and I don't understand it at all. I only ever made 1 edit to this site and that too the Sheriff Woody Pride page and I edited because it had unsourced info claiming that Tom Hanks was going to be voicing Woody in Kingdom Hearts III and we have no confirmation of that. I edited that page because I wanted to help add info and remove false info, not because I wanted vandalize it. I didn't edit anything on it like "Woody is gay and he eats Walt Disney's sh!t for breakfast." I didn't add anything like that to the page. For any admin reading this I'm begging you to give me another chance. I didn't even get a real chance really. Again, I made this account because I wanted to help Wikipedia grow as a site, not because I wanted to ruin it. I really only plan on editing Wikipedia occasionally. Again, I don't feel my name violates the rules of this site and I was banned unfairly. I really hope you guys understand that I'm not going try and harm your site at all and I really hope an Admin understands how I feel this ban is unfair.

Decline reason:

You did violate WP:USERNAME and we've told you that. Pick a new name. Yamla (talk) 23:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How did I break the rules?[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BillyBob125TheEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Could you guys please explain how my name is inappropriate? As I'm not understanding here. Wikia (Another MediaWiki site) allowed this name so why can't you guys? Please explain to me how I broke the username rules? And don't just say I did. I want a specific answer, what rules did I specifically break? As the ones that you listed don't fall under this. It's not profane, it's not threatening, it's not attacking, it definitely ain't impersonating anyone and I plan to contribute positively. -- BillyBob125Poopz (talk) 18:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your username is not acceptable. You can change it, or you can argue pointlessly. Your choice. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:06, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So poop is banned in usernames? Huh?[edit]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

BillyBob125TheEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

BillyBob125TheEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I guess poop does violate the rules for inappropriate usernames since 3 admins told me although that doesn't necessarily mean I agree with banning the term in usernames now. So for any admins that see this I'd like a new username, please. BillyBob125Poopz (talk) 04:26, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Renamed and unblocked. Note any further instances of trolling or any instances of vandalism will result in an immediate reblock. You are welcome to edit productively, but we don't want to see any more immature behaviour from you. Yamla (talk) 13:20, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]