User talk:BigBazMaster
Concerns with 'Dee why point'
[edit]I just have a couple of concerns with this article. First off it would be great if some sources could be added to the article, not just to verify it's content but to verify it's importance as requested by the first tag. Also the style of writing is a bit unencyclopedic but I'm sure that can be fixed. And lastly the article needs to be restructured to make it easier to read and to make it more encyclopedic. If all this can be fixed then the article shouldn't need to be a candidate for deletion. Thanks, SMC89 10:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Dee why point
[edit]A tag has been placed on Dee why point, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Plasticup T/C 12:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)