User talk:Bidgee/Requests for comment/Aaron Brenneman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this sysop and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: ~~~~~), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: {{mono|{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)}}.

Please note: This template is for listing disputes about actions that are limited to administrators only, specifically these actions:

  • protecting and unprotecting pages
  • deleting and undeleting pages
  • blocking and unblocking users

For all other matters (such as edit wars and page moves), please use the template at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example user.

Statement of the dispute[edit]

This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this administrator's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

Desired outcome[edit]

This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus.

By rasing this I hope that full honest apology for the handling of the whole saga, wrongful block and their behaviour is given by Aaron Brednneman. My block log to be annotated by Aaron Brednneman stating that the block was wrongfully done (links in block logs are useless as how many people copy/past and read the link?) and Aaron Brenneman should recall himself to allow other editors to see whether he should continue to have the Admin tools or not. Bidgee (talk) 16:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Description[edit]

{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}

Sequence of events[edit]

Article history

Full times and dates can be seen here since this summary would be longer if added.

Article talk page

Full times and dates can be seen here

Warnings

Aaron Brednneman as an involved Admin decided to warn us even though he had not ask or taken it to a third party. He only warned Stepopen and myself but not Cecilex. He even re-threatened me

ANI and Aaron Brednneman

I would list the diffs and comments made on ANI but I'm having a hard time going back to the date the ANI thread was made so the archive will have to do. Most if not everyone agreed that the block should not have happened, while I do agree my behaviour was not ideal however having an Admin who is involved will to allow SPA's to reinserting content which didn't cite on what was stated or just plainly unreliable to the fact they were POV or opinion based articles. However Aaron Brednneman has failed to answer a number of my questions in the ANI thread, as a editor fine but as an Admin it is not good enough.

The fact that Aaron Brednneman said that full protection wasn't needed yet blocking me (more then an hour later even though someone else also reverted Cecilex's edit), has me questing he ability to be an Admin.

Even the way they have handled themselves on my talk page and the fact that Nick Thorne's comment explains how I feel out of this whole mess.

Powers misused[edit]

  • Blocking (log):
  1. Bidgee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)


Applicable policies[edit]

  1. Using the block for punitive action when it was clear that I hadn't or would revert or disrupt the article
  2. Conflict of interest in the dispute and using the Admin tools to block one editor and not the other
  1. Very much like the blocking policy, due to the fact they they were involved in the dispute (via the heated talk page discussion)

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute[edit]

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
  10. [10]

Users certifying the basis for this dispute[edit]

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

Other users who endorse this statement[edit]

Response[edit]

This is a summary written by the sysop whose actions are disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the sysop's actions did not violate policy. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view[edit]

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view by[edit]

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view by[edit]

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion[edit]

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bidgee/Requests_for_comment/Aaron_Brenneman&oldid=1064223474"