User talk:Balsymbolism

Nomination of Bakait Entertainment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bakait Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bakait Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 00:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Why have you nominated my article for deletion, I don't understand, either you be kind enough to explain me the reasons ( refrain from posting links of rules & regulation instead point me out the specific reason cutting out all bullshits) or remove that idiotic deletion notification pissing on head of my article.Balsymbolism (talk) 07:22, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

It is not your article - nobody owns a Wikipedia article. The notification has to stay until the discussion is closed, which normally takes a week (but it can end earlier or last longer). In the discussion, the specific reasons are pointed out, and if anything about it is unclear you are welcome to ask, keeping in mind that the only concern for the participants in the discussion is to make sure Wikipedia policies are followed. (That the current references in the article do not support notability has already been pointed out in the discussion.) If you don't want to participate there, and don't want to find out the reasons by reading the information given to you on this page, and don't want to use the services of the tea house where you'd get answers to your questions, there is not much else anyone can do. --bonadea contributions talk 08:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Dear Bonadea, What a great favour you did to me by pointing out the greatest of all cosmic truths that NOBODY OWN A WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE! I will be ever grateful to you for your such kind gesture. Moving on, I definitely don't want to own any article but what I definitely want is that this article should be there on wikipedia so that in future someone can contribute to it so that it can be like any other useful article on wikipedia. I wonder how every one is hellbent over the idea that this article should be deleted for you all self-proclaimed vanguards of great articles can accept nothing but GREAT ARTICLE that too without letting any article to be there which can develop over the period of time. No, you guys don't want that, all that you folk want is A GREAT ARTICLE IN ONE STROKE! and ah! what a beautiful weapon you people flaunt, the weapon of NOTABILITY! I appreciate your resounding cry that NOBODY OWNS A WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE, but what astounds me is how come you don't realize that how immensely powerful you all guys are when it comes to mess around with someone else's effort to put up something for how easily you wrote above and I quote "the current references in the article do not support notability has already been pointed out in the discussion."

• claps in admiration of Mr./Miss/Mrs. Bonadea*

Balsymbolism (talk) 10:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Bakait Entertainment. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

No one is trying to look into the credibility of my article, everyone is just busy in issuing warning...please visit the referenced links in the article, they are credible sources. They are some of the most respected media houses from India which has praised films released by Bakait Entertainment and hence Bakait Entertainment deserves a wikipedia article.Balsymbolism (talk) 14:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I am aware that sources have been cited, but you aren't supposed to remove AfD templates until the AfD discussion is closed. --UnforgivablyPotatoes (talk) 15:07, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete.

Despite having credible sources, my article is considered for deletion, I just can't understand this charade of censorship!Balsymbolism (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Uhh... I don't think there is a need to repeat yourself. I think whoever is visiting or has witnessed your contributions got the point. --UnforgivablyPotatoes (talk) 20:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Bakait Entertainment. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. --UnforgivablyPotatoes (talk) 12:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Bakait Entertainment, you may be blocked from editing. --UnforgivablyPotatoes (talk) 13:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Despite having credible sources, my article is considered for deletion, I just can't understand this charade of censorship! Balsymbolism (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

No, it's not being censored. Wikipedia isn't censored, even though some oversighters (users who were granted the ability to hide specific revisions or content from public view) may sometimes use this as a form of condemnation of memory especially on blocked or banned users, sometimes to save face, other times just out of being mad or feeling schadenfreude. (being happy about others' misfortunes) The reason the article you created is being considered for deletion is because it may not be able to comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I am indifferent on the matter though, but I do think your article is fine. (even though I don't like the Vigil B-word, but you don't have to censor it and you shouldn't censor it anyways) --UnforgivablyPotatoes (talk) 19:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Well, I respect your indifference but since you are one of the editors who are of the opinion that this article about Bakait Entertainment has to be deleted, let me bring in to notice that my article fully comply withe the notability guidelines (as far as I can understand) and so far your concern about word BASTARD is concerned, then pray explain me o lord what is this: Lucky_Bastard_(2013_film) Balsymbolism (talk) 20:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Bakait Entertainment, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bakait Entertainment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --UnforgivablyPotatoes (talk) 13:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Balsymbolism, you are invited to the Teahouse!

First of all I have to know that this article of mine about Bakait Entertainment is not going to be deleted by your so called EXPERIENCED EDITORS...there is no point talking to your editors who does nothing but censor and deletes the articles you try to put up...Balsymbolism (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

So far, the article is still up, and the AfD discussion seems silent. No, I think I made a typo while trying to link to the AfD discussion. Here's the actual AfD discussion page. There's only two people; both of them asking that it be deleted, but luckily the article you created is still there, and I helped fix some things on it too. --UnforgivablyPotatoes (talk) 20:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Balsymbolism! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Mr. Potato for improving my miserable article, I mean thanks a ton...but it would be matter of great favour if you can help me in getting rid of the deletion notification that is sitting on the head of my article...I would really appreciate it!Balsymbolism (talk) 20:51, 21 October 2016 (UTC)