User talk:Azra singh

Hello, Azra singh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Abductive (reasoning) 13:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits[edit]

Hey there. You incorrectly altered a lot of election results articles. I changed them back. The data was correct before. Confirmed by the Senate website and House Clerk Website. Cole Dalton (talk) 23:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto here.—Markles 13:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian Conservative Parties[edit]

The BC Liberal Party is a centre-right political party, therefore it is a conservative party. Unless you can find information stating otherwise stop changing the template. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 02:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism at Anna Hazare[edit]

[1] I came here to inform you about your vandalism but it looks like you have a pattern of doing this. I will take it to ANI. Please see the relevant notice board. Zuggernaut (talk) 03:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Azra singh. Please visit Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive819#Vandalism by Azra singh and explain exactly why you made this edit. Thank you. — Satori Son 04:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:05, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If for some reason you want to respond to the thread at WP:ANI, please post here and I or another user will copy the info for you. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Azra singh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to start contributing positively to wikipedia

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TN X Man 13:50, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given that every edit you've made to Wikipedia so far has been to add false information, why should we believe that? Specifically, what type of positive contributions do you want to make? Qwyrxian (talk) 02:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]