Jump to content

User talk:Australiansofarabia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Australiansofarabia! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 07:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Anonymous (film) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEs71wU7CY8&feature=related. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Shake-speare First Folio Mask.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Shake-speare First Folio Mask.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shake-speare First Folio Mask Ogburn Mystery of.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shake-speare First Folio Mask Ogburn Mystery of.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Iamunknown 16:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this also applies to File:Shake-speare First Folio Mask Ogburn Mystery of.jpg -- Iamunknown 16:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Non-free film poster for Anonymous film Studio Babelsberg Press Conference 29Apr2010.jpg.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Non-free film poster for Anonymous film Studio Babelsberg Press Conference 29Apr2010.jpg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your edits have been reverted[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I have reverted most, if not all, of your edits to Elizabeth Trentham, Countess of Oxford and Susan de Vere, Countess of Montgomery. Wikipedia has several policies that apply to fringe theories such as the Shakespeare authorship question and the Oxfordian theory of Shakespeare authorship, and your edits violated some of those, specifically WP:ONEWAY which limits the importation of fringe theories into main page articles unless the article is itself about that theory, and WP:RS, which specifies what sources are acceptable for Wikipedia articles to use. Broadly speaking, sources which promote fringe theories are not acceptable references for main page articles.

I know it’s frustrating to work hard on an article and then have your work reverted. I suggest you acquaint yourself with Wikipedia policies and guidelines such as WP:FRINGE and WP:NPOV, as well as the two I mentioned above. If you have any questions you can always ask at one of the noticeboards such as WP:FTN, WP:NPOVN, or WP:RSN. It takes a lot of time to learn your way around Wikipedia, so try not to get frustrated or anxious. Tom Reedy (talk) 02:44, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]