User talk:Augustineswindon

Welcome!

Hello, Augustineswindon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Speedy deletion of St augustine's church swindon[edit]

A tag has been placed on St augustine's church swindon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UzEE (Talk • Contribs) 12:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rodbourne[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rodbourne, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.staugustines-swindon.co.uk/evenswindon.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation[edit]

Ignore the speedy deletion tag above. However you do need to expand the St Augustine's Church, Swindon article. But keep that article strictly on-topic - about the church. To see what a Wikipedia church article should be like, look at Special:Contributions/Peter I. Vardy. If you have anything to say about the church's patron, put that in the article about the saint.

As to an article about Rodbourne / Even Swindon, I had carefully transferred your stuff to Rodbourne when I was most irritated to receive the above message from the CorenSearchBot since the text was all good encyclopedic stuff. Now I am assuming you are the webmaster of staugustines-swindon.co.uk, so the easiest thing for you to do is to add a note at the bottom of the page you copied saying "Wikipedia has permission to use this text". (Or take one of the other actions given in template:copyvio at "If you hold the copyright to this text".) Having done that, do please re-create the Rodbourne article. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of St Augustine's Church, Swindon[edit]

A tag has been placed on St Augustine's Church, Swindon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KrakatoaKatie 18:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]