User talk:Atiyogafan

Welcome!

Hello, Atiyogafan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 18:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kundalini article[edit]

Hi Atiyogafan, thanks for your recent additions to the article. Unfortunately, I had to revert them since you deleted many references. If you would like to re-add your new material, please do so in small steps, preferably one at a time so they can be reviewed by other editors. Please do not delete anything that is referenced. Review my comments alongside my recent changes. Check out the article in its current state and try to make your additions fall into the current structure. Freelion (talk) 05:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, please don't simply revert the changes that I have made. I have restored the article to how it was before you messed it up. You changes do not reflect a general consensus among editors. Please follow the advice I have given you in the last post. If you would like to discuss this, please start a new discussion on the talk page. Freelion (talk) 06:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chakra article[edit]

Same goes for this article. Although you did add some references and delete some unreferenced material, you also deleted referenced material. Please try again, this time do it one step at a time so that others can review. Do not delete referenced material. Anything that may be contentious, please discuss on the talk page. Freelion (talk) 07:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to start deleting unsourced material you have to apply this rule evenly and with some discretion. You deleted some unsourced material and left some others meaning you are picking and choosing according to your whims. Some of that unsourced material may have helped fill out the article and was not controversial. Did you really need to challenge it or are you trying to push your own agenda?

Please use some more discretion regarding unsourced material. Make changes in small steps and seek consensus. Freelion (talk) 06:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bold revert discuss[edit]

Please read the Bold Revert Discuss guideline

Some of your changes have been reverted so please do not continue to revert and cause an edit war. At the moment we are in the discuss stage. If you would like to make changes to the articles listed above, please discuss your proposals on the corresponding talk pages. Freelion (talk) 06:49, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]