User talk:Arlington0804

July 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Raymond Arroyo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Raymond Arroyo was changed by Arlington0804 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918434 on 2018-07-11T21:12:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Raymond Arroyo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 01:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Raymond Arroyo, you may be blocked from editing. Mlkj (talk) 12:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raymond Arroyo. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 19:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion at Talk:Raymond Arroyo#Inclusion of sneaker comments to build consensus for removing the content you object to. _signed,Willondon (talk) 20:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _signed,Willondon (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Raymond Arroyo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have been told multiple times to engage with other editors on the article's talk page for edits you disagree with/want to implement. — That Coptic Guy^{ping me!} (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. _signed,Willondon (talk) 03:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the edits at Raymond Arroyo[edit]

Regarding the edits at Raymond Arroyo, while the content you initially removed was poorly sourced as I mentioned here, recent edits have addressed that concern with the addition of reliable sources. If you feel the content is still problematic, please use the article's talk page (there is already a discussion at Talk:Raymond Arroyo#Inclusion of sneaker comments) and explain why the content you just removed is not relevant to the article's subject. If you continue to edit war by removing the content without adequate explanation on the article's talk page you may be blocked from editing. - Aoidh (talk) 15:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like User:Arlington0804 continues to edit war by removing the entire Controversy section on Raymond Arroyo and does not communicate as well. Untamed1910 (talk) 19:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Raymond Arroyo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 02:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]