User talk:AntiFascist92

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Acetotyce. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to National British Resistance because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Acetotyce (talk) 17:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National British Resistance. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Acetotyce (talk) 17:42, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National British Resistance, you may be blocked from editing. Acetotyce (talk) 17:44, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Acetotyce. That page is Nazi propaganda by a convicted criminal, homophobe and racist. It should be deleted.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at National British Resistance, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: National British Resistance was changed by AntiFascist92 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952132 on 2014-08-22T17:52:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization, person or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Daniel Case, this may be a misunderstanding. To me, the username "AntiFascist92" seems one that would be adopted by someone that considers themselves an anti-fascist, and either was born in 1992, started using the internet in 1992, graduated high school in 1992, retired in 1992 (OK you get the idea). I don't know of any organisation, nor is there likely to be one, that is called "Anti-Fascist" or even "Anti-Fascist 1992" or anything similar.

Hi AntiFascist92, while I sympathise with your aims and concerns, here on Wikipedia we don't make assertions about living people without including the evidence with the assertions. I've therefore removed (blanked) a recent edit (comment) you made to someone's talkpage, although the contents of your edit remain preserved in the edit history. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Demiurge1000 as Anti Fascist is more of a personal belief rather than a group or organization... Anyone can be an Anti Fascist, its a personal preference on politics, I myself do not like a fascist ideology.

I agree again, apologies for not responding to the issue fast enough. The article in concern is a Political party with a nationalist ideology, and secondly AntiFascist92; Edits like these constitute as Vandalism and are not acceptable and helpful to Wikipedia at all. Fascism in my opinion is quite awful but here in Wikipedia, we must preserve neutrality --Acetotyce (talk) 20:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

+1 to Acetotyce and Demiurge. The name indicates the agenda. Yes, none of us like fascism, whatever certain vandals think, but we believe the facts about it speak enough to that dislike. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right, so you clicked the wrong block reason, or at least, permitted the wrong block explanation to persist on this talkpage. Other than that, good job. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]