User talk:Annjune

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Annjune! Thank you for your contributions. I am SkyGazer 512 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 13:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heron Preston has been accepted

Heron Preston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:17, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Annjune, thank you for submitting this; as you see above, it's now a part of the mainspace on Wikipedia. The reason I accepted it is because the topic had signficant coverage in multiple reliable sources in the article, meaning that it meets the general notability guideline. I've made quite a few modifications to the article, which you should take a look at so that your future articles can be even better. In particular, I fixed some duplicate refs, removed some unsourced material per WP:BLP and WP:V, added another reference, did some copy-edits, made sure all material was followed by an inline citation, and cleaned up some punctuation. Most of these are just minor issues, but the unsourced material is important; all material must be sourced and for biographies of living people, any possibly contentious information must be followed by a reliable, inline citation. If you're looking for ways to improve the article now, you could make some minor copy-edits to make the tone slightly more encyclopedic, maybe reorganize the article some, and preferably split it into sections so that it can be read easier. Besides that the article looks nice; thanks again for helping improve Wikipedia, and let me know if you have any questions!--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:22, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]