User talk:AnderssonDeGaspari

How to Console Widows[edit]

Thanks for the great article! I will add some references to it and look for an image. Mjpresson (talk) 19:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, AnderssonDeGaspari, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mjpresson (talk) 20:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How to Console Widows[edit]

Hello again. Is there a copy of this film available in Brazil? I have the YouTube channel DeleriosoAnormal I would like to put it on. I would pay for it. Thanks again for creating the article. Mjpresson (talk) 04:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Strange World of Coffin Joe (TV Show)[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Strange World of Coffin Joe (TV Show) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PhGustaf (talk) 22:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criancisse[edit]

Pára de criancisse [1], nem vc, nem a wikipedia ganham nada com essa atitude. É o típico protesto burro. Mantenha-se firme na luta contra os usuários autoritários, não saia desistindo por qualquer merdinha.

Aconselho a pedir o restauro dos partidos políticos eliminados, assim que o LIBER for mantido. sds. 201.17.79.52 (talk) 01:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Não estou protestando, só acho que a wikipedia em português é um projeto que naufragou. Tem pouco conteúdo e quem cria algo sofre deleção e perseguição. Não são só usuários autoritários, são administradores autoritários. Não é o tipo de comunidade que gostaria de pertencer. Boa sorte na sua luta, mas não tenho paciencia para ficar discutindo com este pessoal. AnderssonDeGaspari (talk) 11:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Baby Whisperer[edit]

The article The Baby Whisperer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Breach of WP:N as no secondary sources have been found despite being in need of references and having questionable notability since at least April 2010 (previous template)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tris1313 (talk) 03:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fooled By Nature[edit]

The article Fooled By Nature has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced a decade with no sources forthcoming

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]