User talk:AltraNuke43

Welcome!

Hello, AltraNuke43, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Bejnar (talk) 17:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ajumogobia & Okeke

I notice that you substituted the deleted page for the redirect at Ajumogobia & Okeke. After consensus is reached at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion is it considered good manners to accede to that decision. The page that you substituted for the redirect did not meet any of the infirmities identified in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajumogobia & Okeke, in fact it appears to be exactly like the deleted page. If you have discovered independent reliable sources that substantially discuss the Ajumogobia & Okeke law firm, I would suggest that you create a new article in the drafts article space or your own draft userspace, adding the template Draft article, {{Draft article}}, at the top of the draft. In that new article it would be necessary to cite those reliable sources that provide verification of the information about the firm and that provide verification of the notability of the firm. It is also valuable in an article to state in the lead section exactly why the law firm is important. As the guideline says, the lead should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies. When you have finished the new article it is time to submit it for review at Articles for Creation (AfC). Submit the article by adding the code {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. This will place the article in the current month's category of AfC submissions. For example, articles submitted this month are listed at Category:AfC submissions by date/September 2015. After submission it will then take a couple of weeks for reviewers to process the page ensuring that it complies with Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. The reason for this "Articles for creation" process is to avoid some of the pitfalls that resulted in the former article being deleted. If the reviewers do find problems, you can correct them in advance. I hope this helps you understand Wikipedia process better. Good luck. --Bejnar (talk) 17:44, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]