User talk:Alternate Brazil

March 2024[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. DrKay (talk) 04:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alternate Brazil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see no reason why I should have been blocked and accused of being a puppet. I have only made two edits since creating this account. What is the criteria for prosecution and sentencing so quick as it was? Alternate Brazil (talk) 04:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You Arthur Brum

You globally-locked Arthur Brum sock

You Arthur Brum

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alternate Brazil (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Was I blocked for making two edits similar to someone else's five years ago? It seems kind of arbitrary. Does this mean that one can no longer make such edits, that one is automatically someone else's puppet? Can't there be just one case of coherence or coincidence? After all, I have a taste for the history of Brazilian royalty, and many of these edits mentioned are topics of common knowledge among my peers, among historians who study the Brazilian monarchy, among monarchist activists who are millions of people, and even among the common population, given the Brazilian mainstream media attention on the topic since at least 2013. I didn't do anything wrong, I just edited according to my knowledge - which of course can be debated and debated, and I would like to be able to continue editing on Wikipedia, especially topics related to the Empire of Brazil. Alternate Brazil (talk) 16:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't find this explanation plausible. Additionally, Confirmed to Counterfactual history in my sandboxes, so there's clearly at least some amount of sockpuppetry going on. Yamla (talk) 16:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.