User talk:Alluarjun2604

Welcome

Hello, Alluarjun2604, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:27, 13 October 2016 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Premam (soundtrack) - sources

Hi there and welcome to Wikipedia. A few notes about your contributions at Premam (soundtrack). Sourcing is important at Wikipedia. We don't use blogs as references, because anyone can start a blog and publish content. User-generated content is of no value at Wikipedia. So a site like milliblog.com and 123telugu.com are not sufficient and will be removed. Rather, mainstream sources that have established reputations for fact-checking and integrity, like newspapers, major magazines, and their online presences, are the types of sources we need.

The second issue, was that you summarized the critical response to the soundtrack as positive, but you did not provide a source that arrived at that conclusion. We can't cherrypick good reviews and then summarize those reviews. As you can imagine, if we allowed users to do that, articles would be full of people's personal biases. Anyone could replace the good reviews with bad reviews and say that the response was negative. That's not helpful. Thanks for understanding. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Premam (soundtrack). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff: [1] As I have previously noted, the summary of critical response you have added is not attributed to a specific voice from a reliable source. If you don't know what I mean by this, feel free to respond below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:31, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Andarivaadu, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [2] Additionally, "Mixed to _____" phrasing is widely shunned by WikiProject Film as meaningless synthesis. Regardless, your opinions have no place at Wikipedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alluarjun2604. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dhruva (2016 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alluarjun2604. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)