User talk:Ahmadvns

Welcome!

Hello, Ahmadvns, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Akhtar raza, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb1 (talk) 05:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akhtar raza[edit]

A tag has been placed on Akhtar raza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Akhtar raza, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akhtar raza[edit]

A tag has been placed on Akhtar raza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akhtar Raza Khan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Akhtar Raza Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds (talk) 07:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Akhtar Raza[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Akhtar Raza, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not add copyrighted material to articles. I have removed the material numerous times and you insist on adding it back in. The material is a direct copy of http://www.taajushshariah.com/lifehistorycontents.html, http://www.yanabi.com/forum/Topic60052-28-1.aspx and other sites. If you continue to add copyrighted material to the article you may be banned from editing or creating articles. You also risk having the article removed from Wikipedia. ttonyb1 (talk) 17:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Akhtar Raza has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwordpress\.com (links: http://en.wordpress.com/tag/mohammad-akhtar-raza-khan-qadiri-azhari/, http://en.wordpress.com/tag/mohammad-akhtar-raza-khan-qadiri-azhari/ (redirect from http://en.wordpress.com/tag/mohammad-akhtar-raza-khan-qadiri-azhari/)).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:17, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Akhtar Raza do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bwordpress\.com (links: http://en.wordpress.com/tag/mohammad-akhtar-raza-khan-qadiri-azhari/, http://en.wordpress.com/tag/mohammad-akhtar-raza-khan-qadiri-azhari/ (redirect from http://en.wordpress.com/tag/mohammad-akhtar-raza-khan-qadiri-azhari/)).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding copyrighted material to Akhtar Raza[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Akhtar Raza. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. I again ask to you to please STOP adding copyrighted material to articles. I have removed the material numerous times and you insist on adding it back in. The material is a direct copy of http://www.taajushshariah.com/lifehistorycontents.html, http://www.yanabi.com/forum/Topic60052-28-1.aspx and other sites. If you continue to add copyrighted material to the article you may be banned from editing or creating articles and the article could be removed from WIkipedia. ttonyb1 (talk) 14:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahmadvns. You have new messages at Ttonyb1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

License tagging for File:Azharu Fatawa Front Page.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Azharu Fatawa Front Page.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Azharul Fatawa New.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Azharul Fatawa New.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Alazhar Alhazhar.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Alazhar Alhazhar.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Masjidmasjid.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Masjidmasjid.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Stifle (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Akhtar Raza[edit]

A quick reminder, please do not add copyrighted material to articles. ttonyb1 (talk) 15:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alahazratstamptwo.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alahazratstamptwo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Fakhreazhar.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Fakhreazhar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 21:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jamiatur Raza exterior view.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jamiatur Raza exterior view.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 21:15, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Safinaone.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Safinaone.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 21:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Akhtarraza.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Akhtarraza.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 21:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Major bias in your article Akhtar Raza[edit]

Greetings. Your article Akhtar Raza has a massive amount of sectarian bias, so I am attempting to bring it to WP standards. Your cooperation and assistance would be appreciated. MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Azharulfatawatwo.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azharulfatawatwo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Azharulthird.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azharulthird.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jamiatur Raza[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jamiatur Raza, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jamiaturraza.com/introduction.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:54, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akhtarrazafatwa.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Akhtarrazafatwa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alazharuniversity.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alazharuniversity.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Large, unexplained deletions at Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi[edit]

Greetings, could you please explain your substantial deletions at Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi? They appeared to be destructive, and were swiftly reverted, particularly as you did not clarify your intent with any Edit Summary. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:40, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmadvns (talk) 10:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC) I would like to clarify you that my edits are constructive. The photo of Ahmed Raza is false, as he was against photography, and he has written several fatwas against photography, this hand made photo is spreading by Deobandis, as they are against Ahmad Raza and wants to defame him. And the second thing is, this photo has no credibility, I have done sevaral resaerches in his (Ahmad Raza) life, so that, I strongly believe that this photo is false.[reply]

Beliefs. And the beliefs of Ahmed Raza is not at all like that, neither the follower of him nor Ahmad Raza himself, has this type of beliefs, these are false allegations. Can you prove that he has written anywere in his books or fatwas. I just want to maintain credibility of wikipedia. I hope now you'll find reason to remove such things.

Nomination of Akhtar Raza Khan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akhtar Raza Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhtar Raza Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Summichum (talk) 16:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akhtar Raza Khan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Akhtar Raza Khan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Summichum (talk) 16:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]