I might respond to you here, unless your message is not noise.

Organization

I have seen your comment about religion and organization. This concept is very funny. --Simon Dicon Montford Mardini (talk) 16:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone says that it is just semantics matter... That's the thing ! Because I don't know why and how some people can argue like this on and on for days just to be the one who add a little thing like this... Have you been banned too or are you also disguted by some method used here and left wiki ? --Agenor 77 (talk) 22:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Dicon Montford Mardini are you still there ? --? 15:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

much ado about nothing

Archive of monologues

Both point to the same diff. --Simon D M (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

rhazut! wrong manip... Anyway it wasn't important--Agenor 77 (talk) 18:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

does that fix it? --Simon D M (talk) 12:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Flag Incident

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nirmala Srivastava, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Simon D M (talk) 09:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's just your POV nothing else. Please cool down --? 09:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

It is a matter of simple fact that you deleted material from said page, material that was well sourced and long-standing, without any explanation on the talk page. Here is the diff. This is not an issue of POV, rather of being held to account for your actions. --Simon D M (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to talk with you for already explained reason. But in fact, I revert erhhh, i really don't know why I'm talking to you --? 14:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Not well sourced at all anyway and as you can see, we are many against these edits... Tahnk you to respect others editors (at once). --? 23:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are very kind, but what do you think I do each time ? --Ag 05:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC) <= look in my messages, this signature is there, thank you to you => --Ag 05:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

The "sinebot" doesn't recognize your signature because there's no link to your userpage. Since you don't sign with your whole name, it means that other editors have to consult the contribution history to see who you are. Out of consideration to other editors, please either sign with your whole name or sign with four tildes, like the rest of us do. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 06:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My dear, should be a new game, harrassing editors with futility, but if you look at my messages, I do sign with

as I do now => --Ag 06:45, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

It's not harassment - we're trying to be helpful. The problem may be that you set up a special signature in your preferences that doesn't link to your userpage. There's more inforation at Wikipedia:Signatures. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 07:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'mnot responsible if wiki doesn't work properly, sorry. Thank you--Ag 07:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

All you have to do is type ~~~~. Try it here just to test that out. It doesn't hurt. -Owlmonkey (talk) 16:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:D Ag 19:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Or are you typing four tilde's already and it's inserting a signature without links? If that's the case, they your user preferences are incorrect. Click on "my preferences" in the top right corner, then under "User Profile" and remove the Signature field contents. New accounts begin with that field empty and do the default behavior. More information on that user preference is here: Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing_your_signature - Owlmonkey (talk) 16:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not type 4 tilde, I click on the signature button because I'm lazy ;) - And in case, how wiki can have wrong option in my preference ? All this isn't important and we better concebtrate ourself on articles. Tks --Ag 19:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, that explains it. You'll find the following guideline: It is common practice to include a link to your user page or user talk page (often both); the default signature links to the user page. At least one of those two pages must be linked from your signature, to allow other editors simple access to your talk page and contributions log. as part of the Wikipedia:Signatures article. Here is an article on how to fix your signature: Wikipedia:How_to_fix_your_signature. The wiki allows people to make this mistake, though it has been often discussed as something to change and noted here: Wikipedia:Perennial_proposals#Disallow_personalized_signatures. Nonetheless, the system does allow you to customize your signature to such a degree that your signature violates the guidelines for signatures. Please fix it when you have a chance, and we'll stop bugging you. How about just a link to your talk page where the "--Ag" appears?. - Owlmonkey (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]