User talk:Adityavagarwal/Archives/2018/June
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Adityavagarwal. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
June 2018 GOCE newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2018 News
  Welcome to the June 2018 GOCE newsletter, in which you will find Guild updates since the February edition. Progress continues to be made on the copyediting backlog, which has been reduced to 7 months and reached a new all-time low. Requests continue to be handled efficiently this year, with 272 completed by the end of May (an average completion time of 10.5 days). Fewer than 10% of these waited longer than 20 days, and the longest wait time was 29 days. Wikipedia in general, and the Guild in particular, experienced a deep loss with the death on 20 March of Corinne. Corinne (a GOCE coordinator since 1 July 2016) was a tireless aide on the requests page, and her peerless copyediting is a part of innumerable GAs and FAs. Her good cheer, courtesy and tact are very much missed. March drive: The goal was to remove June, July and August 2017 from our backlog and all February 2018 Requests (a total of 219 articles). This drive was an outstanding success, and by the end of the month all but eight of these articles were cleared. Of the 33 editors who signed up, 19 recorded 277 copy edits (425,758 words). April blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 15 through 21 April, focusing on Requests and the last eight articles tagged in August 2017. At the end of the week there were only 17 pending requests, with none older than 17 days. Of the nine editors who signed up, eight editors completed 22 copy edits (62,412 words). May drive: We set out to remove September, October and November 2017 from our backlog and all April 2018 Requests (a total of 298 articles). There was great success this month with the backlog more than halved from 1,449 articles at the beginning of the month to a record low of 716 articles. Officially, of the 20 who signed up, 15 editors recorded 151 copy edits (248,813 words). Coordinator elections: It's election time again. Nominations for Guild coordinators (who will serve a six-month term for the second half of 2018) have begun, and will close at 23:59 UTC on 15 June. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible, and self-nominations are encouraged. Voting will take place between 00:01 UTC on 16 June and 23:59 UTC on 30 June. June blitz: Stay tuned for this one-week copy-editing blitz, which will take place in mid-June. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Corinne, Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:37, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Reply
Thank you for your message and your nice words. Sorry if I deleted the message and reply here, but I prefer not to have the following message on my talk page. I'm pretty much discouraged about Wikipedia, and the message from Alex is just hurting me more. I prefer not to see it and not even that other people see it. If your message could have a positive output, the message for Alex quelched any chances, and I'm sure that was the purpose. I'm contributing my knowledge to my own website and my photos as well. Those articles and photos I have created for Wikipedia will remain, but I will not create new content. Elisa.rolle (talk) 19:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Elisa.rolle I understand you not preferring to have messages on your talk page. Discontinuing Wikipedia would be great if you were busy in any manner but not if it is due to misunderstanding, being hurt, etc. We could always amend such reasons. In my honest opinion, and if I were in your boots, I would take Alex Shih's message in a positive note. He is just trying to point out the problems with your edits. I have been pointed out too, to which I have responded by improving my editing style. Improving one's errors would only improve one's own editing style, wouldn't they? :) He has factually also pointed out your "incredible pace" and "useful go-to person for sources, image files and life details about many subjects in general" which shows how important you are to Wikipedia, although the errors made in such a fast editing process, as a matter of fact and not any personal hatred, damage your awesome articles at the very same pace! I cannot help but think you are like the Ussain Bolt that instead of running on tracks is straying off to the bushes. By this I mean you have such incredible potential but only if your process was slightly curved into the better direction you would easily be that Ussain Bolt who wins and creates new records, am I wrong (just think about it positively). To be honest, improve my editing style has immensely helped me in making essays for my college applications process!! By the way, I never really might have been able to imagine I would ever contribute to bird species and am now planning to contribute to extinct species with FunkMonk. It is really really fun! You could join us as there are few editors only who are contributing to extinct species. I feel contributing to Biographies can really be challenging due to the Notability guidelines, etc. but each species is notable and it would be far more easier to contribute to them. You could give it a try and if you start enjoying contributing to such articles you could continue. You could be the second FunkMonk on the website :P ; he has tons of FAs, GAs, and what not, and is a very respected editor. You could also improve your editing style by contributing to such articles as I feel the writing style in those articles is quite less prone to errors. When you feel you have gotten back to track, you could switch back to making biographies. Adityavagarwal (talk) 10:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Adityavagarwal, I'm a feminist and LGBTQ historian. I do not feel like changing my background since those topics are hard. As I said, I went back to improve my books, in these last months I digged LGBTQ architects, LGBTQ artists, many of the info I found are sadly lacking or totally missing on Wikipedia, or totally wrong. William Pahlmann, the man who designed the current camouflage pattern for the US Army was gay. His partner was Jack Conners. They lived and worked together. He was a gay man in the US Army well before the Don't Ask Don't Tell was repelled. And this is totally missing from Wikipedia. But it's no more my task trying to improve it. Elisa.rolle (talk) 10:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Alex Shih Re-ping. I always have this problem with pings... when the first mention doesn't get sent, I struggle to send it again. :P Adityavagarwal (talk) 10:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Lepidoptera redirects
As stated above, here's a start on the Lepidoptera redirect info I promised you.
Before you start
A nifty userscript: If you intend to do a lot of redirect work, it can be incredibly annoying when the redirects keep, well, redirecting you and you have to spend several clicks to get to the actual redirect page. The utterly awesome User:Writ Keeper wrote a nifty userscript for me that stops the redirects from automatically redirecting. Downside is that it does so for all redirects, of course, so on occasion when you want to be redirected you have to spend an extra click. However, it saves so many clicks while working on redirects that it's worth it. I would recommend adding it. (All you need to do is add the line "importScript("User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/noAutoRedir.js")" to your common.js page.)
Avoid flooding your watchlist: A downside of doing a lot of redirect work is flooding your watchlist until it gets to sizes where it has difficulty loading, if you have the "Add pages and files I edit to my watchlist" option in the watchlist section of your preferences enabled. I've personally disabled it permanently (most of my work is spread over many many pages between redirect, categorization and taxobox work; if every separate page I've edited was on my watchlist, I'd have over 30,000 pages and their talkpages on my watchlist) and I'd recommend doing something the same or at least disable them before starting mass redirect work sessions.
Finding redirects to a page: Normally, there is an option called Show redirects only in "What links here" in the left-hand sidebar, which leads to an external tool to find just the pages that redirect to a given page. Unfortunately, it's currently absent, but work to restore it is ongoing. Until it has been restored, you'll have to manually look through the "What links here" list to find all redirects to a page.
Redirect discussion & deletion: I tend to be bold in my redirect work, and just act on my own within the rules, guidelines etc. that exist. If I can personally fix it, I will. (It helps that I'm familiar with both the standards of WikiProject:Lepidoptera (and their parent wikiprojects insects, tree of life, etc.) and WikiProject:Redirects, as well as the rules, guidelines etc. involved with redirects)
Sometimes however, there are cases you can't handle alone, such as when you find a redirect exists but really shouldn't, or when there's multiple ways to handle an existing redirect and you're not sure which is the right one. In those cases, the right venue is Wikipedia:Redirects for Discussion, in shorthand also called "RFD" or "RfD".
(It's also possible you have a personal feeling for what's the right way to handle it but you're not sure consensus for such an action exists, though in those cases I'd just check with other folks working on the relevant wikiprojects. Only if after that no consensus (or more likely, no response) can be found, I'd move to RFD)
An overview
In effect, there are three parts to my work with moth/butterfly redirects:
- Ensuring the necessary redirects exist and are pointed at the correct locations;
- Ensuring that existing redirects, whether created by me or others, have the templates they should;
- and ensuring they have the categories they should.
I'm still working on writing out how exactly to do the three above. Unfortunately, it's an area riddled with "generally this, but not this, and do this if such except if also such unless also that, in which case do that" exceptions. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 23:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Adityavagarwal/Archives/2018, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.
Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
- As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
- Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar:
. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 
, 
, 
, 
. - Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Adityavagarwal! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing