User talk:AdelaMae

AdelaMae is taking a wikibreak of unspecified length, though some editing may be done from time to time. Talk page messages might not receive a timely response. Questions about WikiProject Neopaganism are best asked on the project's talk page.

Today's motto...
→ Dictis facta suppetant
("Let deeds correspond with words")

Nominate one today!

User talk:AdelaMae/Archive1: talk page messages from November 1, 2005 to January 15, 2006.
User talk:AdelaMae/Archive2: talk page messages from January 15, 2006 to October 9, 2006.
User talk:AdelaMae/Archive3: talk page messages from October 9, 2006 to January 31, 2007.
User talk:AdelaMae/Archive4: talk page messages from February 1, 2007 to May 3, 2008.

Regarding SRB Second right brother

After you placed fansite tag, I have completed rewritten the entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_right_brother. My further explanation can be found in the talk page. Please provide your opinion. Otherwise, I will take it as no more objection. --DoubleDate (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. Please check out the updated version.--DoubleDate (talk) 02:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pic/userbox

Just to say I love your 'confused' pic.:) Some of your interests seem similar to mine. Editing the 'obscure' religions articles is quite fun sometimes because they can seem to have a lot of work to do on them. Sticky Parkin 23:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Student Venture

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Student Venture, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Student Venture is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Student Venture, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Student Venture. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:20, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to this on your talk page, but I want to comment here as well that there must have been some kind of mistake. I don't recall ever having edited Student Venture, though I can't tell for sure without being able to see the revision history of the deleted page, and I certainly did not add promotional material. I try to keep my personal biases on the shelf while I'm editing here, but just trust me when I say I have no desire to promote Student Venture. - AdelaMae ^{(t - c - wpn)} 03:26, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While you did create it (as a redirect; "I was surprised not to find an article"), you did not put in the spammy bits. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that makes sense, then. Thanks for the clarification. - AdelaMae ^{(t - c - wpn)} 03:48, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neopaganism

I did notice of certain interest shown regarding Neopaganism in the Spanish Wikipedia. I don't know if you're so active right now, but I'm actually spreading the word around (tehehe). I can help with Spanish if you wish to improve the grammar. Let's talk? Gilwellian (talk) 11:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC) p/s. I'm not active in the English wiki, if you wish to share something else just visit the Spanish one and leave your comment in my discussion section. Cheers! Gilwellian (talk) 11:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello AdelaMae

Dear AdelaMae,

I'm reaching out to researchers and writers interested in the emerging, or re-emerging, movements inspired by ancient culture in the areas of religion/theology/mythology/culture...I spare-headed an artistic collaboration between a music professor, rock-vocalist and poet to create a modern multi-media experience of the cathardic journey inspired by ancient pagan poetic traditions; A romance to nature seen as a beautiful, divine and omnipotent woman.

It has singularly been my goal to respect tradition while allowing a free and spontaneous interpretation...I believe the utility of a quasi-rebirth of some aspects of the ancient religious tendancies would be achieved in an increase of tolerance, sympathy, and freedom of expression in our modern discoures on religion...so much needed. Until we have a cultural revolution tantamount to the politcal revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries [aiding the rebirth of a government of, by and for the people] in the area of religion, I will not rest. Until the rebirth of religions which are of, by and for the people, as fluid as art, as deep as mythology and theology and as powerful as culture, I do not believe we will be truly free no matter what economic or political conditions surround us. Democracy without a democratic cultural is as frustrating as it is ineffectual.

If you have a moment could you peruse the poetry project site. http://www.misbeliever.net As you are a worker in these areas, having ebhanced the Wikipedia, the world's greatest encyclopedia, I would be very honored with any remarks or critisms you could offer either me or my collaborators.

thanks much,

sincerely

Pdiffenderfer (talk) 00:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

paul m. diffenderfer

düsseldorf germany +49 (0) 178 178 2117 http://www.misbeliever.net [email protected]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamara Siuda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamara Siuda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Siuda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 02:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WPN listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WPN. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WPN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:37, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]