User talk:Access Denied/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, I like pie it tastes good,and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. [Though I'm not an admin] here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. --Wiki-World is in town! (talk) 01:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC) P.S. I CANNOT wait for your user page!

Userpage

Sorry to destroy your userpage. You should not use protection templates on pages that are not protected. Doing so is disruptive and misleading.--moɳo 20:09, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, I like pie it tastes good, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it your username also seems a little bit disruptive.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. moɳo 20:11, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

how do i change my username ? I like pie it tastes good (talk) 20:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! You may request a username change at Wikipedia:Changing username. - EdoDodo ^talk 20:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

How in the world is that name disruptive? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 03:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

The phrase I like pie is a common sign of vandalism in articles.--moɳo 03:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Considering this user has yet to edit an article i still think you are a bit preëmptive with the disruption claim. I also commented as such on the CHU/S request. delirious & lost ☯ ^{~talk to her~} 07:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

This username is not even remotely disruptive. It's not even on the radar as far as running afoul of WP:U. Not even close. You are welcome to keep this username. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 02:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Administrator

Hi! I noticed on your user page that you would like to be an administrator, but do not want to nominate yourself. Would you be interested in having me nominate you for administrator? It would be my pleasure. Sapporod1965 (talk) 04:10, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

To be blunt, this account has been active for about one day and has, as of writing this, twenty-four edits, none of which are content contributions. It would be most unwise to nominate this user for administrator at this time. delirious & lost ☯ ^{~talk to her~} 07:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Help!!!

{{helpme}} how do I make a userbox?? I like pie it tastes good (talk) 20:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Read Wikipedia:Userboxes. Ask again if you have a more specific question after that. Algebraist 21:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! My first one obviously sucks but I get the general idea now.

I like pie it tastes goodMy USERPAGE and my TALK PAGE.

I like pie it tastes good (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

MY SANDBOX PAGE

MY SANDBOX PAGE

Otto adler

Hi, I've declined the speedy deletion tag you placed on Otto adler as the page has literally just been created and is (I'm sure) currently being worked on by the author. I noticed that your rationale for nominating the page for speedy deletion was "pointless spam", please note that pages are only deleted as spam articles if there is promotional content within said page but just "Otto adler" is not enough content to determine that and as such is currently inelligible for speedy deletion under criterion G11. I see that you're new here however, so feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you ever have questions regarding speedy deletion or anything else Wikipedia-related. Cheers, Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 00:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Otto Adler article

Greetings. I am currently trying to create an article about Otto Adler. Because this is the first article created, the process may not be as smoothly as I have anticipated. However, the links you provided will help with that. Thanks! Amon Koth (talk) 00:11, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. mono 00:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Baris Bagci

Just a quick note to let you know that I removed the speedy deletion template you placed on Baris Bagci because the article did not seem to meet the speedy deletion criterion A7. The article contains a credible claim of significance (that he is an actor in an award-winning movie)

Please be aware that is normally inappropriate re-add a speedy deletion template when another editor (other than the creator of the article) has removed it, because speedy deletion is only for uncontroversial deletions. If you believe the article still needs to be deleted, please consider WP:PROD or WP:AFD which can be used for deletions which are not covered by the speedy deletion criteria.

I am not an administrator and I do not have any special authority in this matter. If you feel that I have made a mistake, please feel free to contact me on my talk page.

Thparkth (talk) 02:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi

I've seen that you're doing some vandal fighting; first of all, thanks: you're doing a great job!
Have you ever tried WP:TWINKLE? It's great to tag pages for speedy deletion, WP:PROD, WP:AFD and for issuing warnings. Also, you might like WP:FRIENDLY, useful to welcome newcomers and to tag articles for clean-up.
Keep up the good work. ;) Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 23:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gurgaon has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Traxs7 03:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

SORRY! - i was trying to revert the same vandalism you reverted, but huggle reverted your edit instead. Traxs7 03:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

RE: IP Vandalism

When the IP user 205.250.250.192 vandalised Morphine you gave the vandal a level 1 warning. I think that edit deserved at least a level 2 or 3 warning. Ilikepieittastesgood 04:17, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

I try not to WP:BITE users and that includes vandals. I always start at level one and work my way up. Traxs7 04:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Twinkle???

{{helpme}} Where do I download Twinkle? And is it at all compatible with Internet Explorer 8?

(talk page stalker) see "my preferences", and then gadgets and enable from there. ensure you're autoconfirmed and have a account! OpenTheWindows, sir! 00:48, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Removing warning templates from user talk pages

I've seen the template you are writing. Please read WP:BLANKING. "Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of material from a user page is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents. There is no need to keep them on display and usually users should not be forced to do so. It is often best to simply let the matter rest if the issues stop. If they do not, or they recur, then any record of past warnings and discussions can be found in the page history if ever needed, and these diffs are just as good evidence of previous matters if needed." Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 12:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar

Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the {{copyedit}} tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. monosock 03:59, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Why am I getting this message? Mono's delivery method is random, so you probably showed up somewhere Mono went. :)

Matt Cooke (cyclist)

You have proposed Matt Cooke (cyclist) for deletion without giving a reason. Can you add it, please? The references might be illogicaly placed, but everything seems to be sourced. --Schuhpuppe (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Done. Ilikepieittastesgood 20:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I've pointed the local cycling experts to the article since I suspect the man is actually notable. "Too many references", by the way, is not a reason to delete an article, but to fix it. --Schuhpuppe (talk) 21:16, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Gurgaon district Penistone railway station WUSO Prop comedy Faridabad district Penistone FM Lake Rotoiti, Tasman Pearl School of Business Barry Award (for comedy) Gurgaon Rural Saint John the Baptist Church, Penistone Hugh M. Raup Rod Breedlove Arthur Rudolf Hantzsch Acacia mangium Patli-Hajipur Telecom Australia Gurgaon Division Phone (phonetics)

Cleanup Abraham Lincoln Clothing Environmental issues with petroleum Merge SD Snatcher Milk Abortifacient Add Sources Delosperma Bram Stoker 81st Academy Awards Wikify Medusas Glare List of pizzerias Syed Sabir Pasha Expand Professor X Wuthering Heights Selene (comics)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Help? Confused

{{helpme}}

I tried to modify the displaytitle of the userpage by using the template {{DISPLAYTITLE:<font color=" red">ACCESS DENIED</font>}} but nothing is happening! Why is this??? ACCESS DENIED 05:47, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

To prevent problems with misleading page names, there are technical restrictions on changing the titles. Chzz  ►  05:48, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:AccessDeniedStamp.PNG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AccessDeniedStamp.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Chzz  ►  14:46, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Neurolysis/No

I see you've transcluded his subpage onto your talkpage. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 07:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Limera1n

I have nominated Limera1n, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limera1n. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Timneu22 · talk 00:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AccessDeniedStamp.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AccessDeniedStamp.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

RFA Thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which failed with 10 support, 26 oppose, and 13 neutral. Your comments were much appreciated.

On a personal note, thanks for supporting me Access Denied. Your comment let me know that I was on the right track.--White Shadows ^{There goes another day} 16:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Access Denied. You have new messages at User talk:Forty two/Logo shop.
Message added 22:38, 7 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Forty two^{Thanks for all the fish!} 22:38, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Are you armed?

I see you're a vandal-fighter, and I wanted to make sure you are up to date on the latest and greatest tools: Twinkle and igloo! Cheers, —mono(how's my driving?) 01:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Your rollback request

Hello, Access Denied. You have new messages at WP:PERM/R.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--The answer's still "not yet" I'm afraid, but I like the new username! Much better. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Help

I just got the reviewer ability, how do I add the little reviewer icon at the top of my userpage? Thanks. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 05:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

{{Reviewer topicon}} AJCham 05:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Access Denied. You have new messages at Forty two's talk page.
Message added 14:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Forty two^{Thanks for all the fish!} 14:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

The Big Golden Book of Dinosaurs

Hello, I think we can speed this up as a recreated article without improvement, so I've tagged for speedy deletion. De728631 (talk) 21:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

About Champlain Trail Public School

Re Champlain Trail Public School: Schools are not allowed to be deleted by A7; A7 specifically disallows schools. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 01:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about that - I'm still learning each of the CSD criteria. Thanks for the tip though. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 01:40, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) It's alright. After you start tagging for a while, the criteria sticks to your mind, and you don't need to go back to the CSD page. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 01:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

MC10, you may like CSDH... —mono 01:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, it looks pretty useful. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 01:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

User:IBen/TB —mono 01:40, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Laurent Clerc (disambiguation)

Hello Access Denied, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Laurent Clerc (disambiguation), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. —mono 03:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi. I've added rollback for you. Please remember to fully review WP:ROLLBACK. Cheers, thanks for your help on WP and happy editing. Pedro :  Chat  21:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Huggle question

I noticed that with Huggle, one can revert edits from multiple users and/or IP addresses. I was wondering if you could tell me how this is done? Raptor ^{Let's talk}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 21:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I honestly don't even know. I was just reverting vandalism and all of a sudden I saw the edit summary "Reverted five edits by Whisky drinker, X IP, Y IP, and The Utahraptor to last revision by ClueBot (HG)". No idea how that happened. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 21:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Hm...well I guess I could just continue doing it the old fashioned way. I always keep Wikipedia open while I'm Huggling, so I could just go back there and use Twinkle to restore the last version with no vandalism...unless, of course, I eventually do figure out how to use Huggle for that purpose. But that is odd. When I saw that you reverted my edit, I panicked for half a second, then relaxed when a new messages notice didn't pop up. Raptor ^{Let's talk}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 21:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Just keep clicking on the blue back arrow until you get to the last revision you would like to revert. Then click the Revert button to revert it. Also, thanks for cleaning up the vandalism to my user page, I appreciate it! Seaphoto^Talk 16:07, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I know, I found that out when I tried to revert a vandal and accidentally reverted that vandal and ClueBot...I quickly undid the action, of course; I didn't want ClueBot getting on my case for making a mistake again...._{the provided link was my (sad) attempt at a merge on my seventh day of editing. I forgot to redirect and accidentally blanked the page.} The Raptor ^{Let's talk}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 02:41, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Los Roques Links

Hello, i am Antczako and i can not see why my talk page keeps recieving you will get blocked when i am doing nothing else but making the page better. I am improving its information and it is making the page deeper. I guarantee that my links are not for personal gain because they contain information and links to other pages, so the person can learn about the hisotry of the archipelago and about the Scientific Foundation of the Archipelago. It seems to me arrogant that i should be said that this is irrelevant and for perosnal gain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Antczako (talk • contribs) 15:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Your rollback has been removed

I've removed your rollback rights because you appear to have been using them in a content dispute on Talk:Mel Gibson. Rollback is solely for "reverts that are self-explanatory" such as those dealing with "obvious vandalism; to revert content in your own user space; or to revert edits by banned users who are not allowed to edit" (see WP:ROLLBACK). It's not clear that the IP is a banned user (rather than just a blocked user). However, if you have WP:SPI evidence that I'm unaware of or some other explanation I'd be happy to reconsider. EyeSerene^talk 16:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HarveyCarter, an ongoing sockpuppet investigation against this IP. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 16:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on my talk. EyeSerene^talk 16:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Restored, my concerns were unfounded. EyeSerene^talk 16:53, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for your comment on my RFP/R. T3h 1337 b0y 01:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Huggle

Um, what's up with this? Theleftorium ^(talk) 18:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celia Holman Lee

Although as the debate stands there is a consensus to delete, the article was completely rewritten yesterday. I have therefore relisted it, and invite you to revisit it and consider whether you wish to change your !vote. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Thank you for your report at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention (UAA). However, your report was removed as UAA is for name policy infringements that are serious enough to warrant an immediate block. General name policy violations should first be discussed with the user on their talk page. A helpful template to do just that is {{subst:Uw-username}}. Note that a request for comment can be filed if the user disagrees that their name is against the username policy, or has continued to edit after you have expressed your concern. You may find the UAA instructions helpful, and I'd recommend reading them over prior to making future reports to UAA. Thank you. There is not much point in reporting users with no edits. And there is no point at all in reporting a user for a "possible" problem. If they actually start spamming Wikipedia I won't hesitate to block them, but several of your recent reports have been premature. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

RE: User talk:84.13.93.28

I would suggest WP:DNFTT. An IP that made 1 edit before today and is spouting off about sockpuppetry is likely a blocked or banned user; and since they have been blocked again the "conversation" is probably best just ended. Active Banana (talk) 16:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

vandal warning

Please consider removing this final warning. Removing the category is fine since (some of) the other categories are subsets of "Given names." Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Done. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 16:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Drmies (talk) 16:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

My Secret Page

You now can use {{User:Hi878/Secret Page Icon}} It is positioned in the same way as {{topicon}} so you can figure it out from there. :) Good job. ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 19:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi there

When you sent that smile to my talk page, did you mean to give it to Daven200520? Because instead of "Hello, The Utahraptor" it said "Hello Daven200520". Thank you for smiling, by the way. The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 20:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

disgusting

Your behavier is a disgrace to wikipedia. Lojze Pergl (talk) 16:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

No personal attacks, please. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 16:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Lojze Pergl's comment was not a personal attack. Please remind yourself what a personal attack is by reading the linked policy page. Goodvac (talk) 19:06, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Even if granted that it was not a personal attack, it was not exactly helpful or civil. Coming by someone's talk page just to make one disparaging remark is trolling. Defending it is feeding the troll. As you can see from his talk page, this sort of thing got him blocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:32, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Regardless of the surrounding circumstances, it remains that Lojze Pergl's comment was not a personal attack. My point in commenting here in the beginning was to ensure that Access Denied understands what a personal attack is. Goodvac (talk) 19:31, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Review

I have reviewed you, so if you want to go read my review, now's the time to go ahead and read it. The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 22:31, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

RFA Nomination

I suggest that it would be a good idea to enable the edit counting tools to give other editors a better picture of you. Paul2387chat 14:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. Don't. —mono 02:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

You didn't (sigh of relief) —mono 02:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

The page was already deleted per G6 as you can see by the redlink above. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 02:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Unfortunately I learned to not accept early nominations the hard way. But I must say, when you're ready you will most likely make a great administrator. The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 02:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

I'd love to see you as an admin handing out block messages with "Access Denied" at the end. —Soap— 22:41, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Turn your email on...

I have a (long and super important) message for you. See here for how.  ℳono  01:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Done. Access Denied ^talk _contribs editor review 01:24, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I know how to use a watchlist, thank you!

 ℳono  01:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive invitation

There are currently 2,775 articles in the backlog. You can help us! Join the September 2010 drive today!

The Guild of Copy-Editors – September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive The Wikipedia Guild of Copy-Editors invite you to participate in the September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive will begin on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on 30 September at 23:59 (UTC). The goals for this drive are to eliminate 2008 from the queue and to reduce the backlog to fewer than 5,000 articles. Sign-up has already begun at the September drive page, and will be open throughout the drive. If you have any questions or concerns, please leave a message on the drive's talk page. Before you begin copy-editing, please carefully read the instructions on the main drive page. Please make sure that you know how to copy-edit, and be familiar with the Wikipedia Manual of Style. Awards and barnstars A range of barnstars will be awarded to active participants. Some are exclusive to GoCE drives. More information on awards can be found on the main drive page. Thank you; we look forward to meeting you on the drive! — ɳorɑfʈ Talk! and S Masters (talk).

Uhhh... I already joined. Access Denied ^talk _contribs editor review 14:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I have a lot of personal issues on my mind, and I guess I overlooked that you had already signed up. Sorry about that. The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 14:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks from the GOCE

Thank you very much for signing up for the Guild of Copy Editors' September Backlog Elimination Drive! The copyedit backlog stretches back two years, to the summer of 2008! We're going to need all the help we can muster to reduce the backlog to a manageable size. We've set a goal of clearing all of 2008 from the backlog, and getting the total under 5000. To do that, we're going to need more participants. Please invite anyone you can to join the drive! Once again, thanks for your support! If you have any questions, contact one of our coordinators—ɳorɑfʈ Talk!, The Raptor You rang?, or SMasters (Talk).

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Diannaa at 21:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC).

Yum!

The Utahraptor has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

--The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 00:03, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Editor review

Do an editor review? Did you have your editor review transcluded yet? :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, my editor review is transcluded. Access Denied ^talk _contribs editor review 02:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Just making sure, 'cause I saw a few other editors who forgot. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:49, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell's Userpage

Is there anyway to get the dropdown menus (like the one with pictures you just created) to not bleed into the userboxes? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:53, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

What's your screen resolution? Mine's at 1680x1050 and everything looks fine. Access Denied ^talk _contribs editor review 23:55, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Mine is 1024x768 (actually had to look). Also, I had to rollback (due to the images covering the "undo" button) the change to the /Recognized page on HJ's userspace. He wanted that flush with his mop, plus (per above) it was covering TWINKLE buttons and the undo button as well. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:57, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Colors

I seen you inquired about color codes. If you ever need a color code, try List of colors (in alphabetical order) or Web colors (grouped by color). - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Goodbye

I've got a lot on my plate right now, so I'm retiring from Wikipedia. I may or may not return next summer, so until then, goodbye. The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 13:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Access Denied. You have new messages at The Thing That Should Not Be's talk page.
Message added 18:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikify Drive

Since you signed up for the September 2010 GOCE event, I wanted to invite you to participate in a similar event: the September 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. In case you didn't know, "Wikification" is the process of formatting articles using Wiki markup (as opposed to plain text or HTML) and adding internal links to material. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors. Thanks!

 ℳono 

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Mono at 00:24, 29 August 2010 (UTC).

Okay, I think I'll sign up. Access Denied ^talk _contribs editor review 02:47, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

"Act of Leon Trotsky"

I don't understand why this keeps being identified as vandalism. The caption "Act of Leon Trotsky" makes NO SENSE in English. The previous reverter acknowledges the revert was a MISTAKE: see User talk:T. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.24.175 (talk) 17:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

GOCE drive has begun

Hello, I just wanted to take a moment and announce that the September 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive has started, and will run for a month. Thanks for signing up. There's a special prize for most edits on the first day, in case you've got high ambitions. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Diannaa at 03:17, 1 September 2010 (UTC).

Happy Access Denied's Day!

Access Denied has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, so I've officially declared today as Access Denied's Day! For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian, enjoy being the star of the day, Access Denied! Signed, Neutralhomer A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day...Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:11, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! Access Denied 04:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

You're quote Welcome! :) Keep up the great work! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Access Denied/Fooled you

User:Access Denied/Fooled you, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Access Denied/Fooled you and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Access Denied/Fooled you during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  ℳono  04:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

October drive

Sorry, guys. The wikification drive has been bumped to October. You might have noticed already, however. I'm amazed how many people came on as soon as I sent out the invite. With a few more, we can easily meet our goal. Just remember. Concentrate your firepower on the 2008 articles, and you should have no problems. Great work! Also, if you have time, please also invite other users to participate. Thanks!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 21:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC).

Out of retirement

I thought I would let you know that I've decided to return to Wikipedia, only in a semi-retired state instead of completely retired. Life has somewhat settled down for me, and since I'm ditching pre-calculus I'll have a little more free time on my hands. The Raptor ^{You rang?}/_{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 00:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Metazeunerite

Hello Access Denied, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Metazeunerite, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Courcelles 01:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Similarly, I've declined the speedy deletion of Anna Mór Ní Chonghaile. If this was an unsourced claim, particularly for a living person I'd agree, but this is a historic person, and there is a source to back it up. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 19:29, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Descendants of the Honored at Rest in Arlington National Cemetery

Hello Access Denied, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted Descendants of the Honored at Rest in Arlington National Cemetery, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Courcelles 23:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

/* Reproductive Health Bill (Philippines) */

Resolved

 – Removed AfD Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]}

I agree with Uncle G. This is the equivalent of the American Health care bills. There are 3 bill with their own articles. If this bill on the Philippine RH bill is deleted, I will suspect systemic bias. Let's remove the deletion tag, please. Klughilton4 (talk) 08:25, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Access Denied. You have new messages at Jimbo Wales's talk page.
Message added →Alfie^±Talk 12:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GOCE newsletter

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors Backlog Elimination Drive! GOCE September 2010 backlog elimination drive progress graphs Participation report — We have 71 participants in the September drive. 95 people signed up for the July drive, and in May we had 36. Progress report — We have been making solid progress in eliminating the 2008 articles from the backlog so far. If we continue to focus our firepower we can completely wipe out 2008 from the queue. Overall volumes are lower than expected though, with nearly a thousand articles yet to be done if we are to meet our overall target. If you have not yet participated in the drive, we recommend you do so. If each person who signed up edits one article per day from now till the end of the month we can eliminate another 1,065 articles from the backlog. All contributions are appreciated. Announcement: credit for 10k+ articles — Participants editing a 10k word article may claim credit for two 5k+ articles on the leaderboard. Those that edit a 15k word article may claim credit for three. Regardless, the article is still counted as a single article in the tallies. Reminder — Articles from the Requests page can be included in your tally, even if they do not have a copy edit tag. This is a great place to go if you are interested in finding a higher quality article to work on. This newsletter was prepared for the GOCE by Diannaa (Talk), S Masters (talk),  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK, and The Raptor Let's talk.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Guild of Copy Editors at 15:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC).

Here you go

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I noticed you haven't received any awards yet. Well, here's your first of hopefully many. The UtahraptorMy mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 01:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! Access Denied 01:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

No problem. You definitely deserve it. The Utahraptor^{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 01:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Um...

Care to explain this? I'm sure it was an accident. The Utahraptor^{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 02:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I must have accidentally clicked rollback. Access Denied 02:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

That's alright, I've done the same thing. No hard feelings. :) The Utahraptor^{My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions} 02:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Resolved

 – Voiced my opinion at the poll Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]}

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:25, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick vandal-fighting

Resolved

 – Added to watchlist Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]}

Our article on Mary Wollstonecraft has only recently come out of page protection. Apparently it is attracting vandalism again. Thank you for spotting and quickly reverting this. Could you keep this article on your watch list? There may well be more similar childish attacks. BrainyBabe (talk) 12:05, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit requests

Hi AccessDenied - I saw that you left a request for copyediting on Malleus Fatuorum's page for One Step Closer and just wanted to leave you a note. Usually, "expert copyedits" are the last step in the process. At this point, the article has absolutely no references - this should be the first step in the process, as the article won't make it to either B or GA class without these. The prose doesn't need to be expert for these steps. Also, a lot of times, as references are added, the prose changed significantly due to nuances and additional information given by the sources. I would suggest taking a look at some of the other songs that are already of GA class (or FA class) and checking out their referencing. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 12:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Note

I have nominated User:Access Denied/vandalbox for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Access Denied/vandalbox. Cunard (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

CSD G1

yeah, that was the simplest explanation of G1 I could think of. and will do later.--intelati^(Call) 03:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Your sig

Please change it. Especially the size of the red border. Thanks. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 04:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I already did. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 04:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback 2

Hello, Access Denied. You have new messages at WP:UAA.
Message added 03:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I replied to your report for "Thecakeisaliethecakeisalie". Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 03:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

On a side note, where is that lovely user stamp of your's (the one that is big, red, and says "Access Denied")? I could have so many uses for that IRL, if you didn't mind. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 03:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Do you mean this? Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 04:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes! Thank you! You don't mind if I use it in real life some, do you? Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 04:16, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't mind, but Forty two (talk · contribs) created it, so you should probably ask them. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 04:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)