Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!
Here's wishing you a belatedwelcome to Wikipedia, AHA1877. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you.
Additionally, it appears your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest, though you may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.
It is very disappointing, AHA1877, that though you knew from my 02:52, 6 March 2012 that there was concern about your editing the AHA article, you chose to do more editing rather than discuss the problems associated with your edits. Frankly that's not what I would expect from anyone claiming to be the professional representative of a long established organisation. You merely make a bad situation worse. We are more than happy to work with you to improve the article. Equally, we will quite cheerfully delete all of the content you have added to the article in the absence of any input from you. What we will not do is to permit you to annex the wikipedia article as a promotional platform for the AHA. --Tagishsimon(talk)18:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I beg to doubt your assertions and licensing of images loaded to the commons [1]. Are these really your work (you personally), or do you mean they're owned by the AHA? If the latter then the assertions you make in each image "Own work" are wrong. And I advise that you should provide confirmations of the licenses for the images through the OTRS. You'd be the first organisation I've come across to license its logo under the Creative Commons. Most unlikely. --Tagishsimon(talk)03:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Hero dog awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OlYeller21Talktome04:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted the AHA article back to its form before you began editing the page. I know this may seem drastic but please believe me when I say that it's not punitive. The block of this username is also not intended to be punitive towards you.
I would like to offer my help, should you want it, in editing the page. As you have a great deal of information to add, I think the best bet would be to help you create a copy of the article outside of mainspace (where all the article are kept) in your userspace (on Wikipedia but not out in the open). This way, you could edit the article and ask for help. Other editors and I could assist you, again if you want, and make sure the article complies with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Hi. I would very much appreciate any help you can offer. Your idea sounds more than reasonable and totally fair. As I am new on this site, I may require a bit of help. To clarify, when you say "I think the best bet would be to help you create a copy of the article outside of mainspace (where all the article are kept) in your userspace (on Wikipedia but not out in the open). This way, you could edit the article and ask for help." do you mean that I should create the page content on my username page and ask for help, or put it somewhere else? I'm sorry, I just don't quite understand the lingo yet. Thank you so much for offering to help. Ava Harper (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
